During the Double Eleven shopping festival, many consumers, in order to use platform coupons, adopt a method of first adding extra items to reach the threshold and then requesting a refund, so as to buy their desired products at a lower price. This practice, known as the "big promotion add-on refund trick," was originally seen mostly on online shopping platforms, but has now quietly appeared in the tea beverage delivery industry. Recently, a milk tea shop employee posted a customer order, with notes requesting that the toppings not be packed separately and intending to request a refund afterward, which left the employee and netizens astonished. The incident sparked widespread discussion, with netizens both curious about the feasibility of the operation and expressing sympathy for the merchants and employees. This article will recount the incident and analyze the platform rules and industry dilemmas behind this phenomenon. [more…]

In the depths of winter, Mixue Bingcheng has once again become a hot topic thanks to its "Northeast Big Floral" elements. The brand launched a series of fridge magnets featuring floral padded jackets and crispy fries merchandise, drawing consumers in with rich Northeastern flair. However, unlike last year's nationwide campaign, this year only certain regions can participate, sparking discontent among southern consumers. At the same time, out-of-stock merchandise has also hurt the experience for some customers. This article sorts through the details of Mixue Bingcheng's marketing campaign, the cultural background of the Northeast Big Floral, and the current state and hidden concerns of merchandise promotions in the new tea beverage industry. [more…]

Recently, many users on social platforms have been sharing milk tea orders that include non-drink items such as tissues. This is not a brand promotion, but rather the result of consumers being forced to add extra items to meet the minimum order threshold for delivery. Many chain tea and coffee shops set their delivery minimum at 20 to 30 yuan, while a single cup of drink often costs only around ten yuan, leaving customers who just want one cup unable to place an order directly. They can only add tissues, snacks, or upgrade to a larger size to reach the required amount. Some orders also require a minimum actual payment to qualify for free delivery, further adding to the consumer's burden. Store operators say the minimum order fee and delivery rules are set uniformly by brand headquarters and the platform, and franchisees have no authority to adjust them. This discussion surrounding delivery thresholds reflects the real conflict between the demand for single-person, single-cup consumption and platform operating rules. [more…]

Guming's mini-program has quietly launched a new product called "Morning Fresh Milk." The only ingredient is fresh milk, available in hot or cold options, priced at 8 yuan per 500ml. After trying it, consumers discovered that the cup contains exactly the same refrigerated fresh milk brands used in stores for making tea drinks—Yue Xian Huo, Weigang, and Renyangyitouniu—tasting no different from what's sold in supermarkets and convenience stores. Once the news broke, netizens reacted with sharply divided opinions: some felt the price was completely uncompetitive, arguing it's better to just buy from a supermarket or convenience store, and joked that this was "forcing out a product with no real substance," with R&D staff cobbling together a new item just to meet KPI targets; others thought they could simply add espresso or toppings themselves to make a low-cost latte. Some netizens even let their imaginations run wild, speculating that Guming is testing the waters for a foray into the breakfast market. This article will sort through the discussions sparked by this new product and the possible business logic behind it. [more…]

Recently, a netizen shared on social media their encounter with a mooncake tasting at a Starbucks store, where they received only a small piece of black mooncake crust—no filling, and hardly a tasting experience. The comments section quickly erupted, with some joking it looked like a brake pad or shoe sole, and others questioning whether such "stinginess" was intentional. Later, a netizen claiming to be a Starbucks employee revealed the trick: slice it thin so people can't taste the flavor; if they eat too much, they won't buy. This article compiles various tasting comparisons shared by netizens and reviews Starbucks' past tasting marketing and mooncake order-faking controversies, to help you see the tricks behind this small piece of mooncake crust. [more…]

Recently, the "Allergy Sister" incident in Wuhan has sparked widespread attention in the coffee community, and similar phenomena of customers requesting refunds from merchants for various reasons are not uncommon in the food and beverage industry. Some coffee shop owners have reported encountering a customer who repeatedly applied for refunds on the grounds that the drinks' taste was not to their liking, suspected to be an "Allergy Sister alt account." Investigations revealed that this customer had placed orders at multiple shops and repeatedly applied for refunds, citing reasons such as the drink being too bland, too sweet, or too cloying. Some merchants chose to appease the customer to protect their reputation, but others refused to compromise and warned their peers to be vigilant. Such behavior not only harms merchants' interests but also encourages a culture of malicious claims. This article reviews the course of events and explores reasonable ways for merchants to defend their rights when responding to consumer complaints. [more…]

A super value 5-time card launched on Luckin Coffee's Tmall flagship store quickly triggered a buying frenzy because it was priced as low as 13.77 yuan for any 5 cups chosen from 15 classic drinks. However, in the early hours of the next day, many consumers had their orders forcibly refunded by the platform on the grounds of "no longer wanted" without any refund operation on their part, and some, although shown as shipped, did not receive the electronic vouchers. Luckin later explained that a system configuration error had triggered automatic refunds and offered a 32-yuan drink voucher as compensation. But some consumers were not convinced, believing that the brand's unilateral cancellation of the contract amounted to a breach of contract or even fraud, and have filed lawsuits in court demanding reasonable compensation. The incident exposed the performance risks in the sale of electronic discount vouchers and the issue of consumer rights protection. [more…]

Ordering through mini-programs is quick and convenient, and you can even get coupons, but once you place a wrong order and want a refund, you may run into obstacle after obstacle. Recently, a blogger mistakenly ordered 17 cups of coffee through the Luckin mini-program. Within one minute, they tried to cancel, only to find that the mini-program did not display the store’s phone number, while the headquarters customer service kept passing them back and forth through an intelligent robot. In the end, they had no choice but to bear the loss themselves. This incident struck a chord with many netizens, and quite a few shared similar experiences. Consumers are calling for store contact information to be made public or for the self-service refund function to be improved, while Luckin staff also said that stores cannot directly process refunds and that the procedure is cumbersome, expressing hope that the system can be optimized. When convenience and after-sales service become disconnected, how should brands balance efficiency and consumer rights? [more…]

A Luckin Coffee drink from the Meteorite series ended up with a customer unable to suck up the meteorite toppings at the bottom of the cup because the barista had packed a thin straw. After contacting customer service, the customer actually received a full refund for the order. This handling quickly sparked discussion online: some felt the merchant's service was excellent, while others worried that such a "simple and粗暴" refund approach could set a bad example. Is it thoughtful service or excessive compensation? This small matter of giving the wrong straw reflects the different strategies and potential risks that chain coffee brands face in handling customer complaints. [more…]

A Starbucks customer was shocked and concerned about food safety after discovering multiple yellow raised bumps, suspected to be pustules, on the surface of the beef slices in a sandwich she ordered through a third-party platform. She immediately contacted the store to demand an explanation and a refund, and filed a complaint with 12345. Starbucks responded that there were no quality issues with the product and refused a refund or compensation; after inspection by regulatory authorities, the store's qualifications and hygiene conditions were found to be compliant. Ultimately, because the order came from a third-party platform, the platform refunded the order amount. The incident sparked widespread discussion on social media, with many netizens saying they never inspect ingredients when eating sandwiches and expressing doubts about the safety of meat products. So, is it actually normal for yellow granules to appear on the surface of cooked beef? Currently, opinions online vary, and there is no definitive conclusion. [more…]

The Manner Coffee collaboration ceramic cup with WEDGWOOD, a British Royal Warrant brand, officially launched on March 4th, limited to 50,000 units, and quickly ignited social networks. However, on the first day of the event, the Manner mini-program crashed due to excessive traffic, and some consumers who successfully placed orders encountered automatic system refunds and had their orders canceled; others, when purchasing the drip bag cup set, discovered that the complimentary gift had a production date of last November, suspected to be inventory clearance. At the same time, there were also lucky ones who successfully got their desired collaboration items. This collaboration event can be described as full of twists and turns, showcasing the brand's appeal while also exposing shortcomings in its service. As coffee lovers, while paying attention to the hype, we might also take note of the stable quality experience offered by brands like Front Street Coffee. [more…]

Remember ofo? That once ubiquitous bike-sharing brand is still nowhere near refunding deposits, yet its founder Dai Wei has reportedly started a new venture in the US—this time in the coffee sector. It's said that Dai Wei founded About Time Coffee in New York, specializing in iced pearl coffee, where new users can get a free cup upon registration, mirroring the marketing tactics of ofo back in the day. As soon as the news broke, netizens clamored for their money back. Front Street Coffee takes you through the whole story. [more…]

Besides refreshing the mind and waking you up, coffee can also promote intestinal peristalsis, which unexpectedly makes the restroom experience an important standard for judging whether a coffee shop is comfortable. Recently, a netizen from Shandong posted on social media, reviewing some of the coffee shops they had visited from the perspective of the restroom, with a unique angle and rich details. Cleanliness and hygiene, along with smooth flushing, are the basics, while spaciousness and ventilation, pleasant aromas, and the provision of disposable toilet seat covers, wet wipes, sanitary pads, and hand cream become bonus points. A layout with dry-wet separation and a reasonable flow also greatly increases favorability. At the same time, many coffee shops cannot provide restrooms due to space or plumbing limitations, or they impose restrictions on customers using the toilet. Those shops with complete facilities not only meet physiological needs, but also win repeat customers and reputation through detailed service. Front Street Coffee reminds us that paying attention to these often overlooked experiences may bring coffee shops an unexpected win-win effect. [more…]

520 was a great opportunity for merchants to promote sales through livestreams, yet Good Tea's Douyin livestream room sparked widespread consumer dissatisfaction after orders were automatically refunded by the system following a rush to grab coupons, and the topic quickly trended on Weibo. Although the company issued an apology and promised compensation, many netizens still said they were not buying it. The next day's livestream had to be postponed, and the system recovered slowly. Notably, this was already Good Tea's third brand trust crisis in 2022, after earlier exposures and penalties over food safety and tax evasion. Consumers are still waiting for a satisfactory answer on how the incident will develop further. [more…]

Starbucks' "0.01 yuan for two Flat Whites" promotion sparked controversy after coupon distribution failed and orders were automatically refunded, triggering a wave of dissatisfaction and complaints from netizens, with the Shanghai Consumer Council stepping in to communicate. Starbucks China denied allegations of "order cancellation" and "zero-cost customer acquisition," stating that it had fulfilled over 10,000 orders, while more than 900,000 orders were not completed. Lawyers pointed out that once consumers pay successfully, a contract is formed, and Starbucks' unilateral cancellation may constitute a breach of contract. The incident is still unfolding, and the Consumer Council has not yet released the investigation results. [more…]

Recently, a post about 1 Dian Dian's navy salt salted milk green tea charging an extra 2 yuan for added salt sparked widespread discussion on social media. Some customers, following online guides, asked for extra salt, only to be told that one pump of salt costs 2 yuan, which was far from their expectations. Subsequently, 1 Dian Dian employees and official customer service explained that the "salt" is actually a relatively expensive navy salt rock sugar flavor syrup, and according to company policy, additional additions require payment. Although the store has apologized for the incorrect price quote, netizens have derived a new question: since adding sugar costs money, should customers who order less sugar or no sugar also get a refund for the corresponding syrup price difference? This debate about the pricing logic of tea drinks quickly became a topic of interest for coffee and tea enthusiasts. [more…]

A customer purchased a Starbucks Frappuccino coupon on Meituan, successfully placed an order and received a pickup code, but upon walking to the store to collect the drink, discovered that the store had already closed down. The store's phone was disconnected, and Starbucks customer service and Meituan customer service passed the buck to each other over refund responsibility, leaving the consumer in a predicament. An investigation revealed that the store is located at Suning Plaza on Jiefang Road in Xi'an, where the mall is undergoing comprehensive renovation, and the store has actually ceased operations—yet the official app still showed it as open, and orders could even be placed through "Feikuai." Ultimately, after the customer's feedback, Starbucks shut down the ordering channel, Meituan refunded the order amount and stopped delivery services. The incident also sparked discussions among netizens about wrong-store pickup services and the 12315 complaint channel. [more…]

A customer at a Starbucks Reserve store, while paying with a Starbucks Card, discovered that two drinks had been upgraded by default to the pricier Reserve coffee, and during the ordering process the staff never mentioned the word "Reserve." This "default Reserve" incident sparked widespread discussion, with many netizens sharing similar experiences, and a former Starbucks employee also revealed it may be related to KPI assessments. Starbucks customer service initially gave a vague response, but the store eventually admitted the mistake and promised a refund. At the heart of the incident are customers' right to be informed and their right to choose, and it also prompts reflection on where exactly the boundary lies between ordering at a Reserve store and a regular store. [more…]

Open a food delivery app and search for coffee shops, and you're greeted by a flood of abstract symbols in black on white, making you wonder: how are these shop names even pronounced? Some netizens have discovered that by simply taking punctuation marks and mathematical symbols from a keyboard, bolding them, and putting them on a white background, you can mass-produce brand logos. The comments section is full of people sharing images confirming this, with commas, question marks, double quotation marks, multiplication signs, the mathematical constant π, the infinity symbol ∞, and even the # and * on a phone's dial pad all becoming visual identifiers for coffee brands. This trend of minimalist black-and-white symbols, represented by %Arabica and Mstand, is it a form of individual expression or a case of blindly imitating what others do? When consumers can't even name the symbols, how are brands supposed to be remembered? [more…]

Recently, a franchise store of the South Korean coffee chain The Venti was exposed for a serious food hygiene issue: after filing calluses on their feet inside the store, the manager did not change gloves or wash hands and directly made drinks for customers. After witnessing the entire process, the consumer took photos as evidence and called the head office to demand a refund, but was refused. The incident quickly spread online, sparking widespread attention and heated discussion. The Venti subsequently issued a formal apology on its official website and promised to strengthen hygiene training. This "foot callus coffee" incident not only made consumers feel uncomfortable, but also triggered deep public reflection on hygiene management in the food and beverage industry. [more…]