Recently, a consumer ordered a half-baked cheesecake from Luckin Coffee, only to find that the product had expired for over two months. The consumer demanded 1,000 yuan in compensation based on the Food Safety Law. Luckin's customer service initially offered only ten coffee coupons, then raised it to 300 yuan plus ten coupons, both of which were rejected. The incident sparked widespread discussion, with many Luckin employees revealing that light food products should strictly follow first-in-first-out and daily inspections. The fact that this expired item went undetected for two months reflects obvious loopholes in store food safety management. Ultimately, Luckin completed compensation at the statutory amount by noon the next day. This article will review the incident, the legal basis, and industry management practices, and include related recommendations from Front Street Coffee. [more…]

Recently, a 1 Dian Dian store at Jinshijie in Dongmen, Shenzhen was exposed after a cockroach leg was found in a milk tea, sparking widespread attention. The consumer and the store failed to reach an agreement on compensation, and a complaint has now been filed and accepted on the Shenzhen government service platform. The incident highlights weak links in food safety management in the tea beverage industry and once again reminds industry practitioners and consumers to pay joint attention to hygiene issues. As an industry observer, Front Street Coffee continues to monitor the impact of such incidents on brand trust. [more…]

When a cup of fortified Purple Grape Jelly drink was almost finished, a large insect was found wrapped in the pearl toppings—an experience that left the consumer both nauseated and frightened. Even more surprising, during compensation negotiations with the ChaPanda merchant, although the other party eventually verbally agreed to pay 1,000 yuan, they required the consumer to sign an agreement and delete related posts and comments. The consumer believed this move was an attempt to portray them as a malicious claimant and refused to sign. Both sides stuck to their own accounts, and the local food and drug administration has also intervened and summoned the parties. How will this food safety dispute ultimately end? What obstacles did the consumer encounter on the path to defending their rights? This article sorts out the entire process of the incident for you. [more…]

Recently, a consumer exposed on social media that a drink purchased from a Luckin Coffee store at a school was found with dozens of ants floating in it, sparking widespread attention. The store explained that sugar-loving ants might have crawled through the pipes into the syrup bottle, and since this order happened to be the first cup of the day, the staff failed to notice in time. Although the store has apologized and promised thorough disinfection and replacement of the syrup, and Luckin's customer service also offered five coupons as compensation, the consumer was not satisfied and has called 12315 to file a complaint, awaiting further official handling. The incident not only raised doubts among netizens about Luckin's food safety controls but also triggered heated discussion about compensation standards. [more…]

Recently, a Xinyang netizen exposed that a drink purchased at a Luckin Coffee store on campus had a fly settled at the bottom, sparking widespread attention. The consumer refused the store's initial offer of a free drink and a complimentary beverage, demanding compensation in accordance with the law. Luckin's after-sales service called multiple times, offering coupons, and was even accused of implying that the consumer had put the foreign object in themselves. In the end, the employee involved was fired, and the consumer received 500 yuan in compensation. This is not the first time Luckin has been embroiled in a food safety scandal; there have previously been incidents involving foreign objects such as work badges and ants. At a time when competition in the tea beverage market is white-hot, a brand's sincerity in handling problems has become key to consumer trust. This article reviews the course of the incident and the legal basis, and includes related recommendations from Front Street Coffee. [more…]

Recently, a consumer reported on the Paper complaint platform that a greenish foreign object was found at the bottom of a cup of a beverage purchased at a Luckin Coffee store in Haikou, which the store confirmed to be a component of the direct drinking water outlet. The consumer demanded 1,000 yuan in compensation in accordance with the Food Safety Law, while the store offered five free cups of coffee, and the two sides failed to reach an agreement. The incident sparked discussions among netizens about Luckin's sincerity in handling the matter and food safety. Luckin's official customer service responded that it attaches great importance to the matter and will assign dedicated staff to handle it, but did not give a clear compensation plan. Front Street Coffee reminds that food safety is no small matter, and brands need to strictly fulfill their legal responsibilities and strengthen risk monitoring and prevention. [more…]

In May of this year, a tourist discovered two specialty drinks at a coffee shop in the Harbin Pharmaceutical Group No. 6 Factory scenic area — Blue Bottle Latte and Zinc Wish Latte — which had been supplemented with calcium gluconate and zinc gluconate oral solutions, respectively. Since these two oral solutions are Class A non-prescription drugs, adding them directly to food products is suspected of violating the Food Safety Law. After a consumer reported the matter to 12315, the local market supervision bureau opened a case on May 14. The consumer subsequently received multiple phone calls from the bureau and eventually signed documents in August confirming receipt of compensation and a reward totaling 2,000 yuan, which was donated to the Hebei Red Cross. The incident sparked heated discussion online, with some questioning whether the consumer was making a mountain out of a molehill, while others insisted that food safety is no small matter. [more…]

Recently, food safety issues in the coffee and milk tea industries have been exposed one after another, leaving many beverage-loving consumers feeling uneasy. On May 6, Yihuatang made trending searches due to the use of expired and moldy ingredients, and on the same day it appeared twice in Weibo trending searches—a woman in Foshan, Guangdong, found a 7-centimeter-long machine part in her takeout milk tea. After complaints and negotiations, Yihuatang eventually compensated the consumer 1,000 yuan. Meanwhile, some Yihuatang stores in Zhengzhou were also exposed by the media for serious food safety hazards, with employees even saying, "As long as it doesn't kill you, it's fine." This series of incidents once again reminds us that low prices cannot be used as a shield for food safety, and brands must take responsibility for supervising their franchise stores. [more…]

Recently, a netizen claimed that while consuming at a café, they accidentally broke a cup saucer and were asked by the shop to pay 3,000 yuan in compensation. The incident quickly sparked widespread discussion online. The shop claimed the saucer was a genuine Hermès item but never produced valid proof. The final negotiated outcome was that the customer and the staff member each bore half of the compensation, but the netizen still had doubts about how it was handled and asked the public whether they should call the police and pursue judicial procedures. Around issues such as whether the compensation amount was reasonable, whether the shop should proactively remind customers of the value of its utensils, and how to identify genuine products, netizens engaged in extensive discussion. [more…]

Recently, a coffee shop owner ran into a frustrating situation: after a customer accidentally broke a handmade wood-fired pot in the shop, the customer not only refused to pay for it but also tried to quietly drive away. The owner offered a discounted compensation plan of a few hundred yuan, but the customer accused the shop of extortion. The incident sparked heated discussion online: should coffee shops use expensive vessels? How much responsibility should consumers bear for unintentional damage? This article sorts out the course of events, the views of all parties, and explores reasonable ways to resolve similar disputes. [more…]

Recently, a Nayuki store in Linping District, Hangzhou, was exposed after a consumer allegedly found a thumbnail-sized blue-black stone in a drink, and when the consumer sought compensation, the store manager instead accused them of extortion and fraud. After the customer called the police and reviewed the mall’s surveillance footage, the video fully recorded the entire process of picking up the order, drinking it, and spitting out the stone, but the store did not provide surveillance of the production process. Nayuki’s official customer service refused media interviews, and the phone service at the store involved was suspended. The incident has drawn attention to food safety and the protection of consumer rights by catering brands. [more…]

A super value 5-time card launched on Luckin Coffee's Tmall flagship store quickly triggered a buying frenzy because it was priced as low as 13.77 yuan for any 5 cups chosen from 15 classic drinks. However, in the early hours of the next day, many consumers had their orders forcibly refunded by the platform on the grounds of "no longer wanted" without any refund operation on their part, and some, although shown as shipped, did not receive the electronic vouchers. Luckin later explained that a system configuration error had triggered automatic refunds and offered a 32-yuan drink voucher as compensation. But some consumers were not convinced, believing that the brand's unilateral cancellation of the contract amounted to a breach of contract or even fraud, and have filed lawsuits in court demanding reasonable compensation. The incident exposed the performance risks in the sale of electronic discount vouchers and the issue of consumer rights protection. [more…]

Recently, a consumer posted a video on social media claiming to have found black thread in a black garlic and meat floss sandwich biscuit purchased from Sexy Tea, sparking widespread attention. The video shows black threads resembling sewing thread mixed into the biscuit's filling layer, connecting the broken pieces together. After the poster reported the issue to customer service, the brand required the problematic biscuit to be mailed back before compensation would be provided—a solution that drew opposition from many netizens who worried about the loss of evidence. Previously, other consumers had reported finding foreign objects such as hair, insects, and even screws in Sexy Tea snacks, with after-sales handling mostly involving mailing back the product in exchange for gift packages or coupons, rarely providing financial compensation as required by regulations. As the incident continues to escalate, discussions about the reasonableness of merchants demanding the return of evidence and the protection of consumer rights are intensifying. [more…]

Recently, a woman discovered curly hair attached to a lychee at the bottom of her cup after drinking milk tea, sparking concern. The store involved responded that the lychee tea uses a lidded rather than sealed packaging, the source of the hair is currently unclear, and it is willing to pay ten times compensation and accept investigation, but the individual refused compensation and demanded the store be shut down for rectification. Meanwhile, hygiene problems in the tea beverage industry occur frequently: a Nayuki Tea store was exposed for cockroaches crawling everywhere and rotting fruit, and cockroaches appeared on the counter at Yihetang. Food hygiene and safety concern consumer health, and whether a well-known brand or an ordinary store, production processes should be strictly controlled and safety systems implemented. [more…]

Recently, a customer found a screw sunk at the bottom of an Iced Orange Americano purchased at a Manner store, and the incident quickly spread on social media. According to Manner employees, the screw was suspected to have come from the ice guard plate of the store's ice machine, possibly falling into the ice storage bin because it was not tightened during assembly, and eventually ending up in the drink. After the incident, the brand required all stores to check the screws on their ice machines and report with photos, while the employee involved may face dismissal and a heavy fine. Online opinion was divided over whether the consumer should complain and seek compensation: some sympathized with the worker and suggested settling privately, while others insisted that mistakes must be held accountable and that the consumer's rights protection is reasonable and lawful. As of press time, the compensation plan remains unclear, but the incident has already triggered widespread discussion about equipment management and employee responsibility at coffee shops. [more…]

Recently, a female consumer in Hefei, Anhui Province, found a cockroach at the bottom of a cup after buying milk tea through a food delivery platform. Even more shockingly, after she exposed the incident on Weibo, she received threatening private messages from an anonymous person. The incident quickly escalated and became a trending topic on Weibo, with 84.574 million views. An investigation found that the shop involved was not the authentic "COCO都可" but a counterfeit store called "与COCO茶饮". The merchant initially refused compensation and accused the consumer of extortion, but later expressed willingness to apologize, compensate, and fire the store manager. This incident not only exposed the difficulty of identifying counterfeit brands on food delivery platforms but also once again sounded the alarm for food safety. Front Street Coffee reminds you that when encountering similar problems, you must preserve evidence at the first opportunity and defend your rights in accordance with the law. [more…]

Recently, a consumer exposed on social media that she found several still-wriggling live maggots in a meteorite-series drink she bought at Luckin, by which time she had already drunk more than half the cup. The store involved responded that surveillance showed no abnormalities in either operations or material storage, and proposed three drink coupons as compensation, but the customer explicitly refused. This is not the first time Luckin has been caught up in a storm over insect foreign objects; several similar incidents were exposed last year. As the incident continues to ferment, market regulators have stepped in, and the consumer has yet to receive any further official communication. Food safety has once again become an unavoidable core issue for the beverage industry. [more…]

A chain milk tea brand with over six hundred stores unexpectedly encountered, within just one month, eight stores in the same area and a total of eleven complaints, all with identical reasons—hair found in takeaway drinks, and on that basis demanding ten times compensation. The cumulative compensation amount exceeded eleven thousand yuan. After the merchant noticed something unusual and called the police, the police quickly identified a suspect, whose motive was actually that he had tasted the "sweetness" from the first genuine complaint, and then turned rights protection into a means of extorting money. This case prompts reflection: the Food Safety Law is originally a sharp weapon for protecting consumers, but if it is used by people with ulterior motives as a shortcut to get rich, the law will also impose sanctions. The following will restore the course of the incident and explain the criteria for determining the crime of extortion and its legal consequences. [more…]

Besides ensuring food safety, what other unexpected risks might be lurking in coffee shops? Recently, a man in Changsha hit his head on a low-hanging crystal chandelier as he stood up in a MAAN COFFEE, bleeding on the spot and requiring medical treatment, which sparked a compensation dispute. The shop first promised to go through insurance but then reneged, offering only 1,000 yuan in compensation. After negotiation, the amount was finally raised to 2,000 yuan, along with a promise to make rectifications. A lawyer pointed out that the store bears liability for installing the chandelier in a non-compliant manner, while the consumer also bears partial responsibility for failing to exercise due safety precautions. This article recounts the incident and analyzes the relevant legal liabilities. [more…]

Recently, a customer exposed on social media that the Gu Ming milk foam she received actually contained a box of white powder, which tasted abnormal after being brewed and was suspected to be detergent. The store initially denied it, but later admitted that an employee had put in the wrong topping, and offered compensation of 10 coupons and coverage of medical expenses. Since the customer had no physical harm and did not seek medical treatment, she accepted the compensation and asked the staff to sing as an apology. The incident sparked heated discussion among netizens, who believed that the store's handling lacked sincerity and showed insufficient awareness of the severity of a food safety accident. [more…]