A Luckin Coffee drink from the Meteorite series ended up with a customer unable to suck up the meteorite toppings at the bottom of the cup because the barista had packed a thin straw. After contacting customer service, the customer actually received a full refund for the order. This handling quickly sparked discussion online: some felt the merchant's service was excellent, while others worried that such a "simple and粗暴" refund approach could set a bad example. Is it thoughtful service or excessive compensation? This small matter of giving the wrong straw reflects the different strategies and potential risks that chain coffee brands face in handling customer complaints. [more…]

During the Double Eleven shopping festival, many consumers, in order to use platform coupons, adopt a method of first adding extra items to reach the threshold and then requesting a refund, so as to buy their desired products at a lower price. This practice, known as the "big promotion add-on refund trick," was originally seen mostly on online shopping platforms, but has now quietly appeared in the tea beverage delivery industry. Recently, a milk tea shop employee posted a customer order, with notes requesting that the toppings not be packed separately and intending to request a refund afterward, which left the employee and netizens astonished. The incident sparked widespread discussion, with netizens both curious about the feasibility of the operation and expressing sympathy for the merchants and employees. This article will recount the incident and analyze the platform rules and industry dilemmas behind this phenomenon. [more…]

A couple who explicitly chose not to leave a tip at Starbucks were charged an exorbitant $4,444.44 (about 30,264 yuan) because they didn't check the bill, maxing out their credit card and forcing them to cancel a trip to visit family in Thailand. The store initially refused a refund, then agreed to send a check that couldn't be cashed; after police intervened, Starbucks quickly reissued the check and refunded the full amount. The incident has raised concerns about point-of-sale system glitches and how businesses handle such matters. This article walks you through what happened and the findings of the investigation. [more…]

The Manner Coffee collaboration ceramic cup with WEDGWOOD, a British Royal Warrant brand, officially launched on March 4th, limited to 50,000 units, and quickly ignited social networks. However, on the first day of the event, the Manner mini-program crashed due to excessive traffic, and some consumers who successfully placed orders encountered automatic system refunds and had their orders canceled; others, when purchasing the drip bag cup set, discovered that the complimentary gift had a production date of last November, suspected to be inventory clearance. At the same time, there were also lucky ones who successfully got their desired collaboration items. This collaboration event can be described as full of twists and turns, showcasing the brand's appeal while also exposing shortcomings in its service. As coffee lovers, while paying attention to the hype, we might also take note of the stable quality experience offered by brands like Front Street Coffee. [more…]

520 was a great opportunity for merchants to promote sales through livestreams, yet Good Tea's Douyin livestream room sparked widespread consumer dissatisfaction after orders were automatically refunded by the system following a rush to grab coupons, and the topic quickly trended on Weibo. Although the company issued an apology and promised compensation, many netizens still said they were not buying it. The next day's livestream had to be postponed, and the system recovered slowly. Notably, this was already Good Tea's third brand trust crisis in 2022, after earlier exposures and penalties over food safety and tax evasion. Consumers are still waiting for a satisfactory answer on how the incident will develop further. [more…]

Recently, a post about 1 Dian Dian's navy salt salted milk green tea charging an extra 2 yuan for added salt sparked widespread discussion on social media. Some customers, following online guides, asked for extra salt, only to be told that one pump of salt costs 2 yuan, which was far from their expectations. Subsequently, 1 Dian Dian employees and official customer service explained that the "salt" is actually a relatively expensive navy salt rock sugar flavor syrup, and according to company policy, additional additions require payment. Although the store has apologized for the incorrect price quote, netizens have derived a new question: since adding sugar costs money, should customers who order less sugar or no sugar also get a refund for the corresponding syrup price difference? This debate about the pricing logic of tea drinks quickly became a topic of interest for coffee and tea enthusiasts. [more…]

A customer purchased a Starbucks Frappuccino coupon on Meituan, successfully placed an order and received a pickup code, but upon walking to the store to collect the drink, discovered that the store had already closed down. The store's phone was disconnected, and Starbucks customer service and Meituan customer service passed the buck to each other over refund responsibility, leaving the consumer in a predicament. An investigation revealed that the store is located at Suning Plaza on Jiefang Road in Xi'an, where the mall is undergoing comprehensive renovation, and the store has actually ceased operations—yet the official app still showed it as open, and orders could even be placed through "Feikuai." Ultimately, after the customer's feedback, Starbucks shut down the ordering channel, Meituan refunded the order amount and stopped delivery services. The incident also sparked discussions among netizens about wrong-store pickup services and the 12315 complaint channel. [more…]

Recently, a netizen alleged that they were asked to leave while doing makeup at a Starbucks store in Shenzhen on the day they received their marriage certificate, and the incident quickly sparked discussion. According to the netizen's account, they had called the store in advance to confirm that doing makeup was allowed as long as it did not disturb others, but after making a purchase that day, they were still discouraged by the shift manager during the makeup process and even felt insulted. The store involved responded that if the smell or powder of cosmetics affects other customers, staff will step in to remind them, that the shift manager's voice was indeed somewhat loud at the time, and that afterward the full order was refunded and two tall drink vouchers were given. The regional manager has stepped in to communicate. Netizens have differing views on this. Some believe a coffee shop is not a place for doing makeup, while others think normal touch-ups are harmless and that there may be another reason for the conflict. The incident has once again prompted reflection on the boundaries of using public space in coffee shops. [more…]

A customer at a Starbucks Reserve store, while paying with a Starbucks Card, discovered that two drinks had been upgraded by default to the pricier Reserve coffee, and during the ordering process the staff never mentioned the word "Reserve." This "default Reserve" incident sparked widespread discussion, with many netizens sharing similar experiences, and a former Starbucks employee also revealed it may be related to KPI assessments. Starbucks customer service initially gave a vague response, but the store eventually admitted the mistake and promised a refund. At the heart of the incident are customers' right to be informed and their right to choose, and it also prompts reflection on where exactly the boundary lies between ordering at a Reserve store and a regular store. [more…]

Luckin Coffee experienced abnormally low-priced orders on the Ele.me platform due to an operational configuration error. After a large number of users rushed to place orders, Luckin handled the situation by unilaterally canceling orders and temporarily suspending online operations. This move sparked strong dissatisfaction among consumers and also drew attention from the legal community: lawyers on one side argued that canceling paid orders was suspected of infringing on consumer rights; the other side pointed out that if it was a major misunderstanding, the contract could be revoked in accordance with the law. If there was intentional malicious marketing, it could also constitute fraud. In the end, Luckin promised to bear all losses and issue compensatory vouchers. This article sorts out the course of the incident, netizen feedback, and lawyers' views, so that coffee lovers can understand the full picture of this controversy. [more…]

Recently, a Mixue Bingcheng store in Shenyang made trending news after a dispute broke out between a staff member and a customer. According to a report by Xiaoxiang Morning Herald, a woman ordered three drinks in advance but was delayed by more than ten minutes after going to the wrong store. When she arrived, she was unable to get the drinks that had already been made, and then got into an argument with a male employee, who even made harsh remarks such as "Eat it if you want, if not, get out." After the incident video was exposed, it sparked widespread discussion among netizens. Some criticized the employee's poor service attitude, while others pointed out that freshly made iced drinks have their own reasonable preparation requirements, but more people believed that the responsibility of both sides needed to be judged based on the full sequence of events. At present, the employee involved has been fired by the store and has compensated the customer. [more…]

For many coffee lovers, buying coffee from a regular store every day has become a habit, and some even buy dozens or hundreds of cups in advance at the store to store there and collect them day by day later. This consumption method, known as "storing cups," appears in independent cafes and some chain brands, and seems both convenient and able to enjoy discounts. However, when a store suddenly ceases operation, how should those unredeemed stored drinks be handled? Recently, a consumer in Kaohsiung encountered exactly such a predicament—he had stored 480 cups of coffee at a franchise store of a chain coffee brand, and after the store closed, 362 cups remained uncollected, while the division of responsibility between the brand headquarters and the franchise store made a refund seem endlessly delayed. [more…]

As competition in the new-style tea beverage sector reaches a fever pitch, Nayuki was the first to list on the capital market, claiming the title of "the first stock of new-style tea drinks" and was once regarded as an industry benchmark. Recently, however, a consumer in Shanghai discovered raw dough that could stretch into strings in a durian bread purchased from Nayuki via delivery. The store explained it as "baked relatively soft," and the refund request was also rejected. This incident quickly fermented on social platforms and once again brought Nayuki's past food safety issues back into the public eye—from expired milk and rotten fruit to chaotic kitchen practices, what has happened to this brand with a halo over its head? [more…]

In a coffee shop, baristas repeat the motions of dosing, leveling, tamping, and extracting every day, until it becomes muscle memory. Yet once a rush hits, even the most skilled person can get flustered. This article rounds up the various coffee "fails" netizens have posted: an iced americano whose espresso vanished into thin air, a clear orange latte with nothing but milk left, a muddled iced lemon drink that forgot the coffee... Behind these unintentional mistakes, it's often a shortage of staff during peak hours or errors made in the rush of automated operation. As a consumer, when this happens, it's best to talk to the staff directly about remaking the drink or getting a refund—after all, everyone has moments when they're too busy to think straight. [more…]

Recently, a consumer exposed that in a ChaPanda takeaway drink, they fished out a piece of avocado that had not been crushed and had already spoiled, sparking widespread attention. The drink involved was from ChaPanda's previously launched fruit and vegetable smoothie series, which in principle should not contain obvious fruit pulp residue. After the incident was exposed, many ChaPanda employees and netizens spoke out, directly pointing to serious dereliction of duty in store operations. At present, the customer has received a full refund and platform compensation, and ChaPanda has also proactively apologized and discussed compensation. This controversy has once again pushed the issues of ingredient quality control and employee operating standards at chain tea beverage brands into the spotlight. [more…]

ChaPanda recently officially announced singer Huang Zihongfan as its LOHAS brand ambassador, launching a variety of freshly made fruit drinks and limited-edition merchandise bundles, which attracted a large number of fans to snap them up. However, after the campaign went live, problems kept cropping up: system crashes, orders being forcibly canceled, and insufficient stock of merchandise, one after another, sparking consumer dissatisfaction. Some netizens questioned whether the limited-edition merchandise had been intercepted internally by employees, but more witnesses and ChaPanda staff came forward to explain, saying that stores were equally caught off guard and that employees were under enormous pressure amid the chaos. The company apologized that same evening and promised to speed up restocking and put the items back on sale. [more…]

Starbucks Workers United has recently publicly expressed dissatisfaction with popular online secret menu items, pointing out that these complicated custom drinks place an added burden on baristas. As the #starbuckshack hashtag on platforms like TikTok approaches 5 billion views, more and more customers are bringing posts into stores and asking for them to be recreated, yet baristas often have never heard of the recipes and the ingredients are not fully available. Some baristas have to make a quarter or even two-thirds of their drinks as hidden custom orders every day, and if the final product does not match the picture, it may be refused or a refund may be demanded. This ordering trend, fueled by social media, not only tests baristas' ability to adapt, but also triggers complaints from ordinary consumers about longer wait times. [more…]

Ordering a takeaway coffee is supposed to be convenient, but a consumer in Beijing found a coffee machine part in their Starbucks latte, and the incident quickly sparked widespread discussion. The store involved explained that the employee who made the drink was a deaf partner who could not hear the sound of the part falling off during operation, and because the part sank to the bottom and its color was similar to the coffee, it went unnoticed. The store has refunded the entire order and compensated with five drink vouchers, and Starbucks has also launched an inspection across all Beijing stores for loose coffee machine parts. This incident not only draws attention to the food safety of takeaway coffee, but also triggers discussion about routine maintenance of coffee machines and the working environment for employees with disabilities. [more…]

The limited-edition Phantom Bear merchandise, a collaboration between coffee chain Manner and the English original production of The Phantom of the Opera, has recently sparked a flood of complaints on social media. After receiving the actual product, many users found that the bear, which was supposed to be cute, suffered from serious quality control issues such as a crooked mouth and lopsided face, and was jokingly dubbed an "unidentified creature." Since the merchandise could only be redeemed with points, many theater fans and coffee lovers went through considerable trouble to get their hands on it, only to be greatly disappointed—some even bluntly demanded returns and the refund of their points. This article will sort out the ins and outs of the incident, presenting user feedback and the quality control controversy surrounding the brand's collaborative merchandise. [more…]

Recently, a Fuzhou branch of the chain tea brand Bao Zhu Gong became embroiled in a public opinion storm over an ordinary customer complaint dispute. A consumer claimed that after their milk green tea was made incorrectly, they received a refund and coupon compensation, but then got into an argument with the store over the usage rules. Subsequently, comments appeared that seemed to be from an employee leaking information, claiming that management fired all store staff because of the customer complaint, and even dredging up an old issue where a student employee had previously been fined 1,000 yuan. The incident quickly escalated, with tens of thousands of comments forcing the original post to be deleted. At noon today, an account claiming to be the owner of the store involved issued a statement, saying that the online rumors were all false and that the person involved had gone to the police station to give a statement and file a report. What is the truth? Front Street Coffee takes you through the full picture of the incident. [more…]