Actress and director Jia Ling sued a company in Anhui for unauthorized use of her cartoon boxing image on the packaging of its "Ms. Jia Black Coffee" and implying weight-loss benefits. Recently, the Qiaocheng District Court in Bozhou, Anhui, ruled that the defendant infringed Jia Ling's portrait rights and ordered it to stop producing the infringing product, issue a public apology, and pay 100,000 yuan in compensation for economic losses. The case stemmed from the box-office success of the film YOLO, when some merchants promoted black coffee products under the guise of "Jia Ling's same style," while the film's official team repeatedly clarified that it had never authorized any endorsement of fat-reducing products. This article reviews the course of events and the key points of the ruling, while reminding consumers to view celebrity-endorsed coffee marketing rationally. [more…]

Recently, a "I Want to Soak" latte series launched by a coffee shop in Beijing has drawn attention on social media. The series features marshmallows printed with the faces of male celebrities, priced at 38 yuan each, with the option to add more marshmallows for an extra charge, and even offers a 48-yuan two-person option and an 88-yuan five-person option. This novel format has attracted many fans to visit and post about it, but it has also sparked controversy: some consumers find the face-printed marshmallows unappetizing, and more people question whether the shop's use of celebrity likenesses as a promotional selling point without authorization may constitute infringement. Innovation in the coffee industry is worth encouraging, but it must be done within the legal framework. [more…]

Recently, a video of a Cotti Coffee employee destroying a standee of former spokesperson Wang Yibo sparked a huge uproar on social media. In the video, the store clerk deliberately cut up the standee's face and posted it with a caption, provoking widespread discontent and a boycott among fans. As the incident continued to escalate, Cotti issued a public statement of apology on February 28, announcing the termination of cooperation with the store involved and its closure, while promising to strengthen training and oversight of the material recycling process. This controversy has brought the issue of material handling standards after the termination of brand endorsement contracts to the forefront, and has once again drawn industry attention to the protection of artists' portrait rights. [more…]

Chagee once launched a free custom cup sticker printing campaign, allowing users to upload images to create milk tea cup stickers. However, many fans used third-party tools to bypass the review process and printed photos of celebrities such as Zhang Linghe as cup stickers, sparking widespread discussion online. Recently, the official function for printing cup stickers was suddenly shut down, with the page displaying "Custom Fu Stickers Are Being Upgraded," catching many fans who had not yet printed their exclusive cup stickers off guard. Lawyers pointed out that unauthorized reproduction of photographic works carries infringement risks, and if used for dissemination, exchange, or sale, it clearly infringes on celebrities' portrait rights and photographers' copyrights. The brand may also bear joint liability for failing to establish an effective review mechanism. This article sorts out the entire incident and analyzes the legal issues and responsibilities of all parties involved. [more…]

Recently, a set of promotional photos from CHAGEE's seventh-anniversary offline event caused a stir on social media. An ordinary consumer who took part in the event discovered that a photo of her with an unflattering expression had been taken without her knowledge and posted by the brand on its official account, after which friends screenshotted it to poke fun at her. When she contacted customer service to demand the photo be deleted, she encountered delays and received no public apology. The brand's explanation of its review standards further led her to question whether she was being treated differently. As the incident intensified, netizens' opinions split into two camps: some criticized the brand's review mechanism, while others felt the person involved was overthinking things to her own detriment. What exactly does this controversy reveal about the gray areas in the portrait-rights clauses of brand event? As of press time, CHAGEE has not yet responded officially. [more…]

Recently, the yogurt brand Blueglass launched the "Superboy Boyfriend Power Comeback" series, adding traditional Chinese medicine ingredients such as Cistanche, Polygonatum, ginseng, deer whip, and oyster peptides. The intention might have been to promote a health concept, but it was questioned for borderline marketing due to the poster labeling it "18+" and suggestive copy. Similarly, Coconut Palm brand coconut juice was fined 400,000 yuan for vulgar advertising slogans, yet it generated over 5 billion yuan in sales. In an era where traffic is king, eye-catching marketing emerges endlessly, but not all of it yields good results. After Blueglass was exposed, the Shanghai Municipal Administration for Market Regulation has launched an investigation, and the relevant copy was revised and republished. However, the negative label brought by borderline marketing may not be easily erased from consumers' minds. [more…]

Coffee shops are supposed to be spaces for savoring and relaxation, yet a recent voyeuristic photo scandal exposed on a Douban group has shattered that tranquility. A coffee shop employee shared secretly taken photos of female customers' thighs in a WeChat group, proudly exchanging comments, which triggered strong condemnation from the coffee enthusiast community. The incident involved multiple coffee shops in Guilin, and the shops concerned issued statements one after another, apologizing for the misconduct of individual employees and dismissing or firing those involved. This incident not only violated customers' portrait rights and privacy but also cast a shadow over the professional image of the coffee industry. As coffee enthusiasts, we should pay more attention to baristas' professionalism and work ethics, and return to our love for and dedication to coffee itself. [more…]

Recently, a Luckin Coffee employee posted footage on social media showing a store destroying co-branded packaging overnight, with trash bins full of unopened cup sleeves and takeaway cups, quickly sparking discussions among netizens about waste and environmental protection. According to the employee, on the eve of the end of each co-branding campaign, stores must cut and destroy remaining materials under surveillance, including previously co-branded Chengdu Cultural Tourism small panda keychains. Some netizens compared this with Cotti Coffee's approach, arguing that continuing to use expired packaging materials both reduces waste and gives customers surprises; others with knowledge of the matter pointed out that the destruction may be forced by the licensing period granted by the co-branding partner, and using them beyond the period could lead to breach-of-contract compensation. Behind this controversy lies the dilemma of materials management and intellectual property compliance amid the co-branding boom. [more…]

Heytea recently officially announced the launch of its first "A-Xi Full-Body Portrait Collection Contest," inviting fans to participate by drawing the Heytea logo—the full-body portrait of A-Xi—with the top prize worth over 9,999 yuan. The submission period ended on October 15, and thousands of entries have been received across various platforms. The total views of related topics on Weibo and Xiaohongshu have exceeded 10 million, and the grand prize will be announced on October 31. Interestingly, on the eve of the event's launch, the Heytea logo quietly went "bald"—the black hair was removed, and the fingers holding the cup disappeared, sparking a frenzy of complaints from netizens. This article reviews the iterative journey of the Heytea logo from its founding to the present, including last year's viral full-body portrait creations by netizens and the April cross-border collaboration with Hiroshi Fujiwara that saw the logo struck by lightning into an afro, analyzing how the brand interacts with consumers through its logo to accumulate brand equity. For more specialty coffee beans, please add the private WeChat of Front Street Coffee (FrontStreet Coffee), WeChat ID: qjcoffeex. [more…]

On World Book Day, Lelecha partnered with Yilin Press to launch "Smoky Oolong" milk tea, centered around the image of Lu Xun, but it sparked controversy due to the advertising slogan "Old Smoky Tune, New Youth." CCTV.com published an article criticizing the collaboration for turning a literary master into entertainment and for inappropriate wording. Subsequently, Lelecha urgently removed the related merchandise and promotional posts. Behind the incident, the boundary issues of tea beverage brands collaborating with historical figures have once again drawn attention. Front Street Coffee takes you through the whole story. [more…]

Recently, a woman surnamed Chen in Taiwan, China, left a negative review for a coffee shop on a review platform and had her personal information, along with that of her relatives and friends, as well as surveillance screenshots, publicly exposed by the shop, accompanied by insulting remarks. The incident sparked strong outrage among netizens, the shop's rating plummeted, and Ms. Chen called the police and filed a lawsuit. The shop subsequently deleted the post and issued a public apology, but Ms. Chen said she had not been contacted privately and would continue to pursue legal action. In this episode of Coffee News, we take you through the whole story, while also focusing on the professional coffee knowledge exchange brought to you by Front Street Coffee. [more…]

Recently, a newly resigned worker posted on social media accusing a Luckin Coffee franchise store in Shandong of unreasonable employment practices, claiming that after four days of training they received only 4 yuan in wages. The incident quickly sparked heated discussion among netizens, with many suggesting seeking help through police report or labor arbitration. Subsequently, the store manager recalculated the pay at 10 yuan per hour for 25 work hours. Other netizens also reported similar experiences at the same store. Front Street Coffee is paying attention to this matter and calls on the brand to intervene to protect workers' lawful rights and interests, while also reminding coffee enthusiasts to be aware of how employment misconduct at franchise stores can negatively impact the brand's image. [more…]

The extraction time for a cup of Americano actually escalated to the 12315 complaint platform? Recently, a netizen ordered an Americano at a coffee shop in Shenzhen and believed that the barista's extraction time exceeded 90 seconds, far beyond the 40-second standard in their understanding, so they demanded a refund and complained to 12315, also requesting that the merchant remove the product from sale. This incident sparked heated discussion in the coffee community: Is there any hard-and-fast rule for the extraction time of espresso? Is it reasonable for consumers to complain about a shop based on their personal standards? This article will recount the incident, sort out the industry reference range for espresso extraction time, and explore the boundary between consumer rights protection and product standards. [more…]

Recently, news about a Luckin Coffee store manager who had an emotional dispute with a 17-year-old part-time female employee, which ultimately led the girl to take medication and commit suicide, sparked heated discussion on social media. The girl's family knelt in front of the store to protest, claiming that the store manager used his position to deceive their underage daughter and is suspected of forcing her into a relationship that led to pregnancy, causing enormous psychological pressure on the girl. After investigation, police determined that the girl purchased the medication herself to commit suicide, that the case did not constitute a criminal case, and that it would not be filed. The judicial authorities organized two mediations, but the man said he was unable to pay compensation. After the incident was exposed, the store manager involved had resigned, and Luckin officially responded that it had not received any relevant notice. The truth of the incident and the attribution of responsibility still need to be further clarified. [more…]

The issue of Starbucks Star Gift Card extension management fees has repeatedly been thrust into the spotlight in recent years. Although the controversy has persisted for several years, consumers have recently reported that their Star Gift Cards were continuously charged this fee without their knowledge. From Mr. Gu's experience to Ms. Zhang's case of being charged for 22 months, and the endless complaints on the Black Cat platform, is this charging mechanism a reasonable rule or a failure to fulfill the obligation to remind? Consumers and Starbucks each hold their own views, arguing endlessly. This article will sort out the whole story, the views of all parties, and the official terms, to help you understand this long-running dispute. [more…]

The trademark and unfair competition dispute between Chayan Yuese and Chayan Guanse has finally reached a阶段性 result. The Tianxin District People's Court of Changsha ruled in the first instance that Chayan Guanse lost the case and must stop the relevant infringing publicity and compensate Chayan Yuese 1.7 million yuan in total for economic losses and reasonable legal costs. This years-long tug-of-war over rights protection, from Chayan Guanse taking the initiative to sue Chayan Yuese, to Chayan Yuese resolutely filing a counterclaim and ultimately winning, has been full of twists and turns. Founded in 2013, Chayan Yuese is a well-known local milk tea brand in Changsha, featuring a Chinese style and adhering to a direct-operation model for a long time. It was only in 2020 that it expanded beyond Changsha to Wuhan, Shenzhen, and other places. After winning the case, the brand announced that it would issue discount coupons to members in celebration. This article sorts out the ins and outs of the case, the brand's development history, and the background related to its Logo design, providing a comprehensive interpretation for coffee and tea beverage enthusiasts. [more…]

In Baghdad, the capital of Iraq, a café that uses authentic Starbucks cups, napkins, and coffee remains open as usual despite facing legal action. This unauthorized store bears the Starbucks mermaid logo on everything from its signage to in-store details, enough to pass as the real thing. The owner, Amin Makhsusi, tried to apply for official permission but was rejected, and ultimately decided to open on his own, claiming connections to local powerful figures. Starbucks is trying to stop this infringement through a lawsuit, but the case was suspended due to alleged threats. This incident reflects Iraq's severe trademark piracy problem, where offenders often act with impunity because they are protected by powerful groups. [more…]

Ethiopia is the birthplace of coffee and the largest coffee-producing country in Africa. Starbucks was once embroiled in a years-long dispute with the Ethiopian government over the trademark rights to the names of three origins—Sidamo, Harar, and Yirgacheffe—which was finally settled with a signed agreement in 2007. Meanwhile, outstanding cooperatives such as Gedeb, Konga, Worka, Halo Beriti, and Idido have emerged in the Yirgacheffe region, showcasing classic flavors of citrus, floral notes, and honey through washed, natural, and anaerobic processing methods. Front Street Coffee has selected a range of Ethiopian staple beans that balance origin distinctiveness with high value for money, taking you deeper into the story of coffee's homeland. [more…]

It is no longer news that chain coffee brands sell merchandise. Products such as cups, pins, and canvas bags can not only increase revenue but also cultivate fan loyalty. However, once merchandise has quality problems, after-sales disputes follow one after another. Recently, a netizen posted that the bottom of the inner liner of a stainless steel insulated cup they bought from Starbucks had black rust spots, and when they asked the official side for a replacement, they were refused on the grounds that it was "beyond the after-sales time limit." The post resonated with a large number of consumers. Some complained that quality control was worrying, while others believed that the way it was used might be the key. Three days after the incident gained traction, the blogger updated the progress, saying that Starbucks had agreed to replace it. Who is actually responsible in this dispute? And how should brands balance the appearance and quality of merchandise? [more…]

On March 16, Heytea trended on Weibo for using WanDianZhang facial recognition cameras. Previously, CCTV's 315 Gala exposed over 20 well-known brands, including Heytea, Kohler, and BMW, for illegally collecting facial information through WanDianZhang cameras without consumers' knowledge. Heytea responded that the cameras are only for security and will never illegally collect facial data. WanDianZhang stated that the platform's facial data volume has reached hundreds of millions and is drafting an announcement to explain its business scope and rectification measures. This incident has once again sparked public concern over the abuse of facial recognition technology and personal privacy security. [more…]