When does a sour americano justify a consumer complaint?

A customer in Shenzhen ordered an Americano, judged the espresso extraction to run over 90 seconds instead of the 40 seconds they expected, and filed a complaint with the 12315 platform demanding a refund and that the shop stop selling the drink. The case split the coffee community over whether extraction time is a fixed rule or a stylistic choice.

Espresso extraction is usually discussed as a range rather than a single number, and taste shifts with the cafe americano ratio of espresso to water. Long, slow shots can read as bitter, thin or sour americano depending on the beans and grind, so quality complaints are difficult to settle on timing alone.

The extraction time of an Americano actually escalated to the 12315 complaint platform? Recently, a netizen ordered an Americano at a coffee shop in Shenzhen and felt that the barista's extraction time exceeded 90 seconds, far beyond the 40-second standard in their understanding. So they demanded a refund, complained to 12315, and also asked the merchant to remove the product from sale. This incident sparked heated discussion in the coffee community: Is there really a hard-and-fast rule for espresso extraction time? Is it reasonable for consumers to complain about a shop based on their personal standards? This article will recount the incident, sort out the industry reference range for espresso extraction time, and explore the boundary between consumer rights protection and product standards.

a▲

Click to follow | Daily specialty coffee culture magazine Coffee Workshop

If you bought a cup of coffee at a coffee shop that did not suit your taste, what would you usually do? Most people would either ask the shop to make another cup or directly request a refund. Many chain brands will remake it for free after receiving customer feedback on taste, and some independent cafes are likewise willing to remake it or refund the fee at the customer's request.

However, recently a netizen ordered an Americano at a coffee shop in Shenzhen. Because they felt the taste was off, after communicating with the shop, they not only requested a refund but also further complained to the 12315 platform. From the consumer's perspective, if their rights and interests are harmed during a transaction, using official channels to complain about the merchant to protect their rights is understandable in itself. Therefore, it is not entirely unreasonable for this netizen to call 12315 because they were dissatisfied with the shop's Americano.

However, what really made onlookers "lose it" was the specific content of the complaint: "The extraction time of Americano should be controlled within 40 seconds. The barista at this shop operated incorrectly, and the extraction time took more than 90 seconds, with video as evidence. It tasted like dishwater. I demand that the merchant remove the coffee product from sale and refund the fee."

According to this netizen, the shop's espresso extraction time reached 90 seconds, while they insisted that espresso extraction should be controlled within 40 seconds. Leaving aside for now what the extraction time should actually be — this issue currently has no unified standard anyway — just the fact that this netizen used it as grounds to complain to 12315 and demand that the merchant remove the product was already enough to make many netizens unable to sit still.

"Does criminal law stipulate that coffee can only be extracted for 40 seconds?"

"If I extract for 70 seconds at home, will he come to my door and confiscate my coffee machine?"

"12315 even regulates production standards? That's stretching its reach too far. How would liability even be determined? If this could be determined, then next time hand-brew sellers would be in danger."

"Anything not between 20 and 30 seconds is sentenced to death."

"Oh no, my broken all-in-one machine extracts for 15 to 25 seconds every time. I'm doomed, doomed."

In the comments section, whether coffee lovers or industry professionals, most people did not quite agree with this netizen's "judgment."

In some "old" espresso textbooks, the extraction time of espresso was indeed described as 20 to 30 seconds. But nowadays coffee bean quality continues to improve, roast levels also vary, and in actual operation the extraction time is flexibly adjusted according to specific circumstances rather than being nailed down to a fixed number. Therefore, within the industry there is no so-called hard-and-fast rule for espresso extraction time, only a reference range.

The espresso production standards set by different coffee shop owners vary somewhat, and some stores also offer lungo drinks, so the extraction time naturally differs according to their respective standards. Yet this netizen, merely because the coffee shop's espresso extraction time did not meet their own self-defined standard, went to an official platform to complain and demand that the merchant remove the product. Hmm... this behavior is like an example given by a netizen in the comments: "In a southern city, I ate a bowl of beef noodles that did not meet Lanzhou standards and tasted especially bad. I refuse to pay and complain, demanding that southern regions be prohibited from selling beef noodles." It seems reasonable, but in fact it is utterly unreasonable.

If a shop's production standards truly violate relevant laws and regulations, then such complaints and demands by netizens are reasonable. But for matters such as espresso extraction time, which have no explicit legal provisions, using it as grounds to complain and demand that the shop remove the product will only turn one's reasonable request into unreasonable pestering.

Image source: Internet

Disclaimer: Some images in this article are from the Internet. For some content on the website, such as images, we will respect the original author's copyright and indicate the source. However, due to the large quantity, there may be individual images or texts that have not yet been attributed. Please forgive us. If the original author has any dispute, they may contact the website for handling. Once verified, we will correct it immediately. Compiled and edited by "Coffee Workshop." Please indicate the source when reprinting. If there is infringement, please inform us for deletion. Thank you~!

The above content is compiled by CoffeeHunters, a coffee news website.