Monday, September 21 2026

Manner Coffee Accused of Discounting Wages During the Pandemic; Company Statement Pursues Accountability Against Former Employee and Details Compensation Plan

Recently, a leak about Manner Coffee's discounted wages during the pandemic sparked heated discussion on social media. The leak claimed that Manner required employees to choose between two compensation options: hourly basic pay, or 80% of Shanghai's minimum wage of 2,072 yuan. The incident quickly trended on Weibo, and Manner subsequently issued a statement identifying two former employees as having made false claims, and said it had reported the matter to police to pursue criminal and civil liability. The statement also detailed wage payment standards during the pandemic, saying its treatment was far above Shanghai's minimum wage, and implicitly suggested that employees of competitor Mstand Coffee were involved. This article reviews the course of the incident, both sides' accounts, and lawyers' views, and explores the legality of barista pay during the pandemic and the state of the industry. [more…]

Hougou Coffee's restructuring draft rejected: Yunnan coffee giant with 11.5 billion yuan in debt reaches a fateful crossroads

The once Chinese domestic coffee giant Hogood Coffee now stands at a crossroads of life and death. The draft reorganization plan failed to pass due to opposition from the financial institution group and the secured creditor group, meaning this Yunnan coffee enterprise, which once managed over 200,000 mu of planting area and had annual revenue as high as 5.691 billion yuan, may permanently exit the stage of history. From supplying instant coffee raw materials to international brands such as Nestlé and Maxwell, to Chairman Xiong Xiangren being sentenced for the crime of unit bribery, Hogood's rise and fall epitomizes a dramatic chapter in Yunnan's coffee industry. This article will sort through the entire process of Hogood Coffee from its highlight to its predicament, presenting its debt crisis, reorganization vote, and the details of the criminal judgment behind it, for the reference of coffee enthusiasts and industry practitioners. [more…]

Milk tea chain hit with 11 tenfold compensation claims in one month: how can food safety law become a tool for profit?

A chain milk tea brand with over six hundred stores unexpectedly encountered, within just one month, eight stores in the same area and a total of eleven complaints, all with identical reasons—hair found in takeaway drinks, and on that basis demanding ten times compensation. The cumulative compensation amount exceeded eleven thousand yuan. After the merchant noticed something unusual and called the police, the police quickly identified a suspect, whose motive was actually that he had tasted the "sweetness" from the first genuine complaint, and then turned rights protection into a means of extorting money. This case prompts reflection: the Food Safety Law is originally a sharp weapon for protecting consumers, but if it is used by people with ulterior motives as a shortcut to get rich, the law will also impose sanctions. The following will restore the course of the incident and explain the criteria for determining the crime of extortion and its legal consequences. [more…]

Milk tea shop employee secretly swaps payment QR code, embezzles 40,000 yuan and is criminally detained; corporate internal control loopholes draw attention

Recently, an incident in which a milk tea shop employee replaced the store's payment QR code with a personal one and misappropriated tens of thousands of yuan from the company trended on Weibo, sparking widespread discussion. According to a notice from the Haidian Public Security Bureau in Beijing, the employee had been collecting payments via a personal QR code since May of this year and concealed the act by cutting off the network and disabling surveillance. The estimated amount misappropriated reached over 40,000 yuan, and the person has now been criminally detained in accordance with the law. This case not only exposes loopholes in financial management at retail stores, but also once again reminds operators to strengthen internal oversight. As a platform for coffee enthusiasts, Front Street Coffee has always followed business developments and compliance issues in the beverage industry. This article reconstructs the course of events and analyzes the relevant legal points. [more…]

Luckin Store Manager Accused of Emotional Involvement with 17-Year-Old Part-Time Girl, Girl's Death from Medication Sparks Concern

Recently, news about a Luckin Coffee store manager who had an emotional dispute with a 17-year-old part-time female employee, which ultimately led the girl to take medication and commit suicide, sparked heated discussion on social media. The girl's family knelt in front of the store to protest, claiming that the store manager used his position to deceive their underage daughter and is suspected of forcing her into a relationship that led to pregnancy, causing enormous psychological pressure on the girl. After investigation, police determined that the girl purchased the medication herself to commit suicide, that the case did not constitute a criminal case, and that it would not be filed. The judicial authorities organized two mediations, but the man said he was unable to pay compensation. After the incident was exposed, the store manager involved had resigned, and Luckin officially responded that it had not received any relevant notice. The truth of the incident and the attribution of responsibility still need to be further clarified. [more…]

Labeled 100% Arabica but adulterated with Robusta: Latest developments in the Seattle premium coffee adulteration case trial

Taiwan, China-based chain brand Seattle Premium Coffee was found to have blended Robusta into several pre-packaged bean products labeled "100% Arabica," prompting prosecutors to charge founder Liu and two others with adulteration and misrepresentation. The brand initially argued that Timorese/Timor varieties are a hybrid of the two species, then later changed its statement, saying it was an administrative oversight that the labels were not updated, and was willing to recall only some batches. The court calculated criminal proceeds at approximately 4.07 million yuan, and Liu sought to pay a public welfare fund in exchange for a suspended sentence. The core dispute in the case is that adding Robusta itself is not illegal, but whether a mismatch between the label and contents constitutes adulteration and misrepresentation under food safety law. This article sorts through the sequence of events, test data, and new courtroom statements, so coffee enthusiasts can understand industry labeling standards. [more…]

The owner of a trendy café in Huzhou was rumored to have AIDS; police confirmed the rumor-monger was detained for four days

Recently, a piece of news about the owner of an internet-famous café in Huzhou having AIDS and infecting over a hundred people spread rapidly on social media, causing panic among local residents. Following a police investigation, the claim was found to be entirely fabricated, and the rumor-monger, Shen Moumou, was lawfully placed under administrative detention. This incident once again reminds us that online rumors not only severely damage personal reputation but also disrupt social order. Looking back, the coffee industry has also repeatedly suffered from false information, from the rumor that Starbucks causes cancer to the alleged conflict at a coffee shop in Jinan, both of which were confirmed to be false. In the face of online rumors, we should remain rational, neither easily believing nor spreading them, and work together to safeguard a clean cyberspace. [more…]

Should You Complain About Espresso Shots Extracted for Over 40 Seconds? Starting from a 12315 Consumer Rights Dispute Sparked by a Cup of Americano

The extraction time for a cup of Americano actually escalated to the 12315 complaint platform? Recently, a netizen ordered an Americano at a coffee shop in Shenzhen and believed that the barista's extraction time exceeded 90 seconds, far beyond the 40-second standard in their understanding, so they demanded a refund and complained to 12315, also requesting that the merchant remove the product from sale. This incident sparked heated discussion in the coffee community: Is there any hard-and-fast rule for the extraction time of espresso? Is it reasonable for consumers to complain about a shop based on their personal standards? This article will recount the incident, sort out the industry reference range for espresso extraction time, and explore the boundary between consumer rights protection and product standards. [more…]

Taiwan Coffee Shop Negative Review Controversy: Shop Publicly Exposes Customer's Relatives' Privacy, Triggering Legal Action and Public Apology

Recently, a woman surnamed Chen in Taiwan, China, left a negative review for a coffee shop on a review platform and had her personal information, along with that of her relatives and friends, as well as surveillance screenshots, publicly exposed by the shop, accompanied by insulting remarks. The incident sparked strong outrage among netizens, the shop's rating plummeted, and Ms. Chen called the police and filed a lawsuit. The shop subsequently deleted the post and issued a public apology, but Ms. Chen said she had not been contacted privately and would continue to pursue legal action. In this episode of Coffee News, we take you through the whole story, while also focusing on the professional coffee knowledge exchange brought to you by Front Street Coffee. [more…]

Shanghai Qingpu Police Bust Counterfeit Starbucks Franchise Scheme: 17 Arrested, Over 40 Million Yuan Involved

A counterfeit well-known coffee brand trademark case involving over 40 million yuan was recently successfully cracked by Shanghai Qingpu police. The criminal gang recruited franchisees nationwide under the name "Starbucks Coffee Service," falsely claiming to have official franchise qualifications and guiding the opening of counterfeit stores. In January 2024, the police launched a unified arrest operation, apprehending 17 suspects led by Yin. The case exposed a complete criminal chain from production and manufacturing, warehousing and transportation, to business training and marketing consulting, and also sounded an anti-fraud alarm for investors in the franchise chain sector. [more…]

Customer Injured After Standing Up and Hitting a Crystal Chandelier at Maan Coffee: Lawyer Analyzes the Division of Liability Between the Store and the Consumer

Besides ensuring food safety, what other unexpected risks might be lurking in coffee shops? Recently, a man in Changsha hit his head on a low-hanging crystal chandelier as he stood up in a MAAN COFFEE, bleeding on the spot and requiring medical treatment, which sparked a compensation dispute. The shop first promised to go through insurance but then reneged, offering only 1,000 yuan in compensation. After negotiation, the amount was finally raised to 2,000 yuan, along with a promise to make rectifications. A lawyer pointed out that the store bears liability for installing the chandelier in a non-compliant manner, while the consumer also bears partial responsibility for failing to exercise due safety precautions. This article recounts the incident and analyzes the relevant legal liabilities. [more…]

Man stages insect extortion scheme against milk tea shop, receives criminal sentence, reflecting food safety loopholes and trust crisis in the tea beverage industry

Recently, food safety incidents in the tea beverage industry have occurred frequently, from Tea Baidao's "real spider" milk tea to the use of expired ingredients, and every so often they trend on social media. However, a news report by Guangzhou Daily on October 12 was entirely different: a 23-year-old man, using his work experience at "a certain tea brand," colluded with his girlfriend and friends to deliberately plant insects in stores in Hangzhou, Dongguan, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Shanghai, and other locations, extorting money under the pretext of food safety, with demands ranging from a thousand yuan to two hundred thousand yuan, and was ultimately prosecuted on suspicion of extortion. This incident not only exposed some milk tea shops' negligence in operations management but also sparked public discussion about the authenticity of food safety complaints. What consumers truly need is a hygienic and tasty drink, not a vicious cycle of deception. This article compiles the ins and outs of the incident and includes related information about Front Street Coffee. [more…]

Luckin Coffee files appeal in the 560 million yuan repurchase payment case, demanding Shenzhou Ucar bear the shortfall top-up liability.

There has been a new development in the trust dispute case between Luckin Coffee (China) Co., Ltd. and Yousheng (Tianjin) Technology Development Co., Ltd., Yousheng Chengyi (Tianjin) Information Technology Co., Ltd., and Shenzhou Ucar Co., Ltd. Dissatisfied with the first-instance civil judgment, Luckin Coffee has filed an appeal with the court. The case involves a repurchase price of over 560 million yuan plus interest, and the focal point of the dispute is whether Shenzhou Ucar should bear the shortfall top-up liability. This article will sort out the background of the case, the first-instance judgment, and Luckin Coffee's appeal requests to help readers understand this closely watched commercial dispute. Follow Coffee Workshop and Front Street Coffee for more professional coffee industry news. [more…]

On his first day on the job, a Mixue Bingcheng employee unexpectedly died suddenly, sparking heated debate over how legal liability should be determined.

Recently, Mixue Bingcheng made trending news due to an employee's sudden death. According to media reports, a female employee in Jingdezhen, Jiangxi, suddenly collapsed after working only three hours on her first day on the job and tragically passed away despite rescue efforts. Mixue Bingcheng responded that they are negotiating with the family, and the incident is still under investigation. This tragedy is not only lamentable but has also sparked widespread discussion on legal issues such as employer liability, work-related injury determination, and social insurance contributions. At the same time, Mixue Bingcheng's previous fine for employing child labor has been brought up again. The health and rights protection of workers has once again become a focal point. [more…]

Macau Coffee Shop Owner Threatened with Knife by Customer: How a Service Dispute Escalated into a Criminal Intimidation Case

In the coffee industry, baristas behind the counter usually face challenges like extraction parameters and latte art patterns. However, an incident that occurred on July 28 at Guia Hill in Macau made a coffee shop owner experience a moment far more harrowing than crafting a perfect espresso—after an argument sparked by service attitude, a male customer actually returned after leaving, holding a fruit knife and threatening the owner. This incident not only injured the person involved but also sparked widespread discussion about occupational safety among coffee industry professionals. [more…]

Cat café customer bitten by cat claims over 3,000 yuan, rejected by the business; dispute over liability arises

Recently, a cat café in Guangzhou experienced an incident where a customer was bitten by a cat in the store. After seeking medical treatment, the customer demanded more than three thousand yuan from the business for medical expenses and emotional distress, but the owner refused. The business claimed that the risks had been clearly stated in the group-buy package and in-store notices, and that the customer, being an adult, should not hold the store fully responsible; the customer side argued that the business had failed to fulfill its safety obligations. Both sides stuck to their own accounts, and the negotiation reached a deadlock. The incident has attracted widespread attention: when someone is scratched or bitten by a pet in a cat café, how exactly should liability be divided? As coffee lovers, when enjoying the pleasure of petting cats and drinking coffee, how can we protect our own safety? Front Street Coffee reminds you that choosing a legitimate cat café and understanding the relevant guidelines is the best way to enjoy your time interacting with cats. [more…]

Hundred-Million-Yuan Franchise Scam Busted: Shanghai Qingpu Police Dismantle "Routine Beverage" Fraud Gang

A fraud case involving "beverage franchise" has recently come to light: Shanghai Qingpu police successfully dismantled a contract fraud gang that used fake brand recruitment as a front, with involved amounts reaching hundreds of millions of yuan. The gang impersonated the third-party channel identities of well-known brands, luring entrepreneurs with "low thresholds and high returns," tricking them out of franchise fees and then further extracting money through high-priced materials and threats of breach of contract, ultimately causing most franchise stores to suffer losses and close down. Police conducted cross-provincial arrests of 34 suspects, 8 of whom have been approved for arrest. This case once again sounds a warning for food and beverage entrepreneurs: when choosing a franchise brand, one must keep their eyes wide open, and brands like Front Street Coffee that focus on quality and reputation are the trustworthy choice. [more…]

Customer's handbag worth 20,000 yuan left behind and thrown away as trash by coffee shop; store refuses to compensate, sparking dispute over liability

Recently, a netizen posted on social media about an incident in which they left their handbag behind while taking photos at a %Arabica store in a shopping mall. According to their account, the bag was found by other customers and handed to the staff for temporary safekeeping at the bar counter, but two hours later it was disposed of as trash by the employee on duty. Because the person could not provide proof of purchase or proof of the item's value, the store refused to review the surveillance footage and refused compensation. After the incident came to light, netizens engaged in heated discussion over whether lost items found by passersby should be kept by the coffee shop and whether the staff's handling was appropriate. Front Street Coffee will also continue to follow issues of property safety in such consumer settings. [more…]

Legal Interpretation of the Luckin Low-Price Order Incident: Consumer Red Lines and Platform Liability Under System Vulnerabilities

The unusual pricing incident involving Luckin Coffee's delivery platform packages has drawn widespread attention. After consumers placed orders at extremely low prices, their orders were unilaterally cancelled, giving rise to legal disputes. Citing the views of a legal blogger, the People's Court Daily pointed out that when a merchant's pricing error results from staff mistakes, the merchant may claim a major misunderstanding to rescind the contract, but this must be resolved through litigation or negotiation. Ordinary consumers who unintentionally buy low-priced drinks have not broken the law, but those who knowingly exploit a system loophole and maliciously place large numbers of orders may run afoul of the law. This article will analyze the course of events, the legal basis, and Luckin's compensation measures in detail, while reminding coffee lovers that when enjoying discounts they must hold fast to the bottom line of good faith and avoid crossing the red line of the law. [more…]

Chagee's DIY Cup Sticker Printing Feature Suddenly Shut Down, Celebrity Photo Uploads May Involve Portrait Rights and Copyright Infringement

Chagee once launched a free custom cup sticker printing campaign, allowing users to upload images to create milk tea cup stickers. However, many fans used third-party tools to bypass the review process and printed photos of celebrities such as Zhang Linghe as cup stickers, sparking widespread discussion online. Recently, the official function for printing cup stickers was suddenly shut down, with the page displaying "Custom Fu Stickers Are Being Upgraded," catching many fans who had not yet printed their exclusive cup stickers off guard. Lawyers pointed out that unauthorized reproduction of photographic works carries infringement risks, and if used for dissemination, exchange, or sale, it clearly infringes on celebrities' portrait rights and photographers' copyrights. The brand may also bear joint liability for failing to establish an effective review mechanism. This article sorts out the entire incident and analyzes the legal issues and responsibilities of all parties involved. [more…]