Recently, a customer found a screw sunk at the bottom of an Iced Orange Americano purchased at a Manner store, and the incident quickly spread on social media. According to Manner employees, the screw was suspected to have come from the ice guard plate of the store's ice machine, possibly falling into the ice storage bin because it was not tightened during assembly, and eventually ending up in the drink. After the incident, the brand required all stores to check the screws on their ice machines and report with photos, while the employee involved may face dismissal and a heavy fine. Online opinion was divided over whether the consumer should complain and seek compensation: some sympathized with the worker and suggested settling privately, while others insisted that mistakes must be held accountable and that the consumer's rights protection is reasonable and lawful. As of press time, the compensation plan remains unclear, but the incident has already triggered widespread discussion about equipment management and employee responsibility at coffee shops. [more…]

Recently, a female consumer in Hefei, Anhui Province, found a cockroach at the bottom of a cup after buying milk tea through a food delivery platform. Even more shockingly, after she exposed the incident on Weibo, she received threatening private messages from an anonymous person. The incident quickly escalated and became a trending topic on Weibo, with 84.574 million views. An investigation found that the shop involved was not the authentic "COCO都可" but a counterfeit store called "与COCO茶饮". The merchant initially refused compensation and accused the consumer of extortion, but later expressed willingness to apologize, compensate, and fire the store manager. This incident not only exposed the difficulty of identifying counterfeit brands on food delivery platforms but also once again sounded the alarm for food safety. Front Street Coffee reminds you that when encountering similar problems, you must preserve evidence at the first opportunity and defend your rights in accordance with the law. [more…]

Recently, a netizen exposed that a certain Cotti Coffee store placed a notice sign in its outdoor seating area, explicitly prohibiting customers from bringing coffee of other brands to sit down, and marking competitor logos with a prohibition symbol. This practice quickly sparked heated discussion: supporters believe that businesses have the right to set consumption-based seating rules, while opponents question whether it涉嫌 excludes competitors and infringes on consumers' right to choose independently. As the topic trended on social media, Cotti officially responded that it had not uniformly required stores to use such notice signs and would verify the relevant situation. Behind the incident, the boundary between business autonomy and consumer rights has once again become the focus. [more…]

Recently, a post about live ants found inside Tims bagel packaging has sparked widespread discussion on social media. A consumer bought two bagels through a food delivery platform, and upon opening the packaging, discovered ants crawling inside the bag, with some even embedded in the cream filling. Although the store issued a refund, it refused the consumer's demand for triple or tenfold compensation. Netizens are divided over questions such as where the ants came from and whether there were hidden risks in the packaging method. The incident has been reported to the 12315 platform, and the consumer's path to defending their rights continues. [more…]

Recently, a consumer posted a video on social media claiming to have found black thread in a black garlic and meat floss sandwich biscuit purchased from Sexy Tea, sparking widespread attention. The video shows black threads resembling sewing thread mixed into the biscuit's filling layer, connecting the broken pieces together. After the poster reported the issue to customer service, the brand required the problematic biscuit to be mailed back before compensation would be provided—a solution that drew opposition from many netizens who worried about the loss of evidence. Previously, other consumers had reported finding foreign objects such as hair, insects, and even screws in Sexy Tea snacks, with after-sales handling mostly involving mailing back the product in exchange for gift packages or coupons, rarely providing financial compensation as required by regulations. As the incident continues to escalate, discussions about the reasonableness of merchants demanding the return of evidence and the protection of consumer rights are intensifying. [more…]

For professional coffee knowledge exchange and more coffee bean information, please follow Coffee Workshop (WeChat public account: cafe_style); for more specialty coffee beans, please add the personal WeChat of Front Street Coffee (FrontStreet Coffee), WeChat ID: qjcoffeex. Recently, the case in which Saturnbird, over the course of 20 months, sued "Qicai Zhi Mi" for unauthorized use of a similar small-cup instant coffee appearance reached a result. The Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court found that unfair competition was constituted, awarded 1.73 million yuan in damages, and ordered the production and sale of the infringing products to stop. Saturnbird became famous for its super-instant coffee and mini coffee cup design, and its packaging sparked a DIY craze and swept social media, which is why it has frequently been imitated and even copied. In this case, "Qicai Zhi Mi" not only had highly similar style, packaging, and promotional images, but also used the search term "Saturnbird same style" to mislead consumers. The case lasted nearly two years, highlighting the current reality in the food industry that intellectual property rights protection is difficult and the boundary between reference and copying is blurred. The article combines cases such as Sexy Tea suing Chayan Guanse to explore how original brands can protect their rights and interests through copyright, patent rights, exclusive trademark rights, and the Anti-Unfair Competition Law. [more…]

Recently, a Xinyang netizen exposed that a drink purchased at a Luckin Coffee store on campus had a fly settled at the bottom, sparking widespread attention. The consumer refused the store's initial offer of a free drink and a complimentary beverage, demanding compensation in accordance with the law. Luckin's after-sales service called multiple times, offering coupons, and was even accused of implying that the consumer had put the foreign object in themselves. In the end, the employee involved was fired, and the consumer received 500 yuan in compensation. This is not the first time Luckin has been embroiled in a food safety scandal; there have previously been incidents involving foreign objects such as work badges and ants. At a time when competition in the tea beverage market is white-hot, a brand's sincerity in handling problems has become key to consumer trust. This article reviews the course of the incident and the legal basis, and includes related recommendations from Front Street Coffee. [more…]

Coffee shops have limited space. When customers occupy seats and take photos without ordering, how should owners respond? Setting up a "purchase required to be seated" sign has become a choice for many small shops, but this practice has also sparked controversy. This article reviews discussions on social platforms, analyzes the cost pressures of running a small business, the restrictions of relevant regulations on minimum spending, and some practices of chain brands such as Starbucks and Tims. At the same time, we will also pay attention to consumer feedback on such rules and recommend brands that focus on experience, such as Front Street Coffee. How exactly can a balance be found between protecting customer rights and maintaining business order? This is worth thinking about for every coffee lover. [more…]

Recently, Starbucks star gift cards have triggered multiple consumer complaints due to automatically deducting a monthly deferred management fee after expiration and lacking clear notifications. Some users reported that the deductions continued for 22 months before they偶然 discovered it, and when they called customer service, they were told that the practice was compliant. An investigation found that although the relevant terms are displayed in bold in the App, users are not required to actively confirm reading them during the binding process. In addition, the activation time is not marked on the star gift card, and consumers' understanding of the "date of activation" differs from the official definition. This article will sort out the focus of complaints, the details of the rules, and the core of the dispute, and explore the boundary between the reasonableness of prepaid card deductions and users' right to be informed. [more…]

Recently, a video about finding an employee badge in a Luckin Coffee drink has drawn attention on social media. According to a netizen's post, while drinking a Luckin cold beverage, they discovered an employee badge with a staff name printed on it at the bottom of the cup. After media verification, the store involved admitted that an employee had indeed lost a badge, speculating that a loose pin caused it to fall into the drink. At the same time, posts on social media about foreign objects such as flying insects, raw material packaging boxes, and equipment parts appearing in Luckin drinks are not uncommon, and stores mostly compensate consumers with refunds plus coupons, triggering some customers' doubts about the brand's attitude in handling such matters. Some consumers have shared their experiences of defending their rights, ultimately reaching a satisfactory solution through negotiation. This series of incidents has once again pushed the food safety and after-sales handling of chain coffee brands into the focus of public opinion. [more…]

Writing a negative review for a coffee shop on a review platform, only to be accused by the merchant of "smearing by a competitor"—such experiences are becoming increasingly common. Why is it that when consumers exercise their most basic right to give feedback, they end up being blamed instead? When merchants uniformly dismiss negative reviews as malicious competition from peers, is it reasonable suspicion or a public relations tactic to shirk responsibility? Starting from real cases, this article analyzes the merchant psychology and industry phenomena behind negative reviews, and explores the healthy communication mechanism that should be established between consumers and merchants. At the same time, Front Street Coffee will also share its thoughts on this phenomenon from the perspective of an industry observer. [more…]

Recently, an employee at a Heytea store in Shijiazhuang searched for a customer's phone number and added her on WeChat to harass her, sparking widespread attention. After the incident came to light, Heytea quickly fired the employee and apologized and compensated the affected customer. This individual case not only exposes the lack of customer privacy protection training at tea beverage brands, but also once again brings the topic of consumer personal information security to the forefront. With the Regulations on the Implementation of the Law on the Protection of Consumer Rights and Interests officially taking effect in July 2024, the boundaries for business operators collecting and using personal information have become clearer, and the cost of violations has risen significantly. This article will review the course of the incident, the brand's response, and the relevant legal provisions. [more…]

The extraction time for a cup of Americano actually escalated to the 12315 complaint platform? Recently, a netizen ordered an Americano at a coffee shop in Shenzhen and believed that the barista's extraction time exceeded 90 seconds, far beyond the 40-second standard in their understanding, so they demanded a refund and complained to 12315, also requesting that the merchant remove the product from sale. This incident sparked heated discussion in the coffee community: Is there any hard-and-fast rule for the extraction time of espresso? Is it reasonable for consumers to complain about a shop based on their personal standards? This article will recount the incident, sort out the industry reference range for espresso extraction time, and explore the boundary between consumer rights protection and product standards. [more…]

Recently, a consumer in Jiangsu discovered that the milk tea they purchased from Chahuanong contained only half a cup. After giving feedback to the merchant, not only was the issue not properly resolved, but they also reportedly experienced SMS bombing and harassment from internet trolls. After the incident garnered widespread attention, Chahuanong officially issued two statements on July 28, first apologizing and then denying hiring trolls, stating that the police have intervened in the investigation. However, netizens in the comments section generally disapproved of the brand's handling, believing that the store was shortchanging customers in the first place and is suspected of leaking customer information, and a mere "full cooperation" is hard to satisfy the public. As coffee enthusiasts, we also focus on issues related to production standards in the beverage industry and consumer rights protection, and Front Street will continue to monitor the progress of the situation. [more…]

After the widespread adoption of mobile payments, ordering by scanning a QR code has become standard in bubble tea shops and restaurants. But have you ever noticed that many ordering mini-programs require you to authorize your mobile phone number or even more personal information before use? In October of this year, the Market Supervision Administration of Putuo District, Shanghai, investigated and dealt with a case involving a catering company illegally collecting consumer information, which sparked widespread attention. The restaurant guided customers to order by scanning a QR code on the table, but forcibly required authorization of their mobile phone numbers, and did not inform them of the purpose of use. Moreover, the backend allowed arbitrary access to and download of member data such as names, genders, mobile phone numbers, and card balances. Ultimately, the company was warned and fined 50,000 yuan. With the official implementation of the Personal Information Protection Law, penalties for such acts will be significantly increased, and consumers' privacy rights deserve more attention. [more…]

Recently, a consumer reported on social media that when they went to a Heytea store with 50 yuan in cash to buy a drink, a staff member told them they could not make change and suggested switching to online ordering. This experience quickly sparked widespread discussion, and many tea beverage industry practitioners chimed in, saying that insufficient small change reserves at stores are indeed a common phenomenon, especially during peak customer flow at mall locations, where staff often have no time to go out and exchange for small bills. However, some voices pointed out that the difficulty of making change should not be shifted onto customers, and merchants should ensure that all legitimate payment methods remain accessible. This is not the first time Heytea has been criticized over cash payment issues, and this incident has once again pushed the cash management problems of chain tea beverage brands into the spotlight. [more…]

Recently, a controversy over a customer being visited at home by a霸王茶姬 (Chagee) employee after leaving a negative review has sparked widespread discussion online, with related topics trending on Weibo on Monday morning. According to Star Video, on July 20, a man in Chengdu, Sichuan Province, posted a video claiming that after consuming a drink at Chagee the previous day, he felt the taste was different from before. He did not choose to request a refund or a remake, but directly left a negative review on the order. Unexpectedly, the next day, the employee suddenly showed up at his door without contacting him in advance, asking him to delete the negative review. After the incident was exposed, netizens had mixed views on the employee's behavior, with some exclaiming "too scary," while others expressed understanding for the worker. Chagee customer service responded that the store wanted to communicate amicably with the customer, and the store manager involved explained that they went to the customer's home because the delivery rider, the store, and the platform all could not get through to the customer by phone. This article sorts out the course of the incident and the views of all parties, and explores reasonable ways for merchants to respond to negative reviews. [more…]

As a prepaid card product launched by Starbucks, the Star Gift Card has long suffered from issues such as limited recharge amounts, excessively high card refund fees, and the inability to clear remaining balances. Four university students discovered during their consumption that when the remaining balance on a Star Gift Card was only 19 yuan, they could neither purchase any Starbucks product nor get a refund to clear the balance. After investigation, they found that the prepaid cards of several tea beverage brands did not have such restrictions. Therefore, in June 2023, they filed a lawsuit against Starbucks, ultimately prompting Starbucks to update the Star Gift Card terms, lower the card refund fee, eliminate the minimum charge, allow custom recharge amounts, and cancel the extension management fee. [more…]

Luckin Coffee experienced abnormally low-priced orders on the Ele.me platform due to an operational configuration error. After a large number of users rushed to place orders, Luckin handled the situation by unilaterally canceling orders and temporarily suspending online operations. This move sparked strong dissatisfaction among consumers and also drew attention from the legal community: lawyers on one side argued that canceling paid orders was suspected of infringing on consumer rights; the other side pointed out that if it was a major misunderstanding, the contract could be revoked in accordance with the law. If there was intentional malicious marketing, it could also constitute fraud. In the end, Luckin promised to bear all losses and issue compensatory vouchers. This article sorts out the course of the incident, netizen feedback, and lawyers' views, so that coffee lovers can understand the full picture of this controversy. [more…]

Faced with the dense Chinese and English labels on coffee bean packaging, many consumers are often baffled, and in the end can only buy a bag randomly based on feeling, with results that are often less than satisfactory. This article starts from the consumer side, sets aside the professional jargon of green coffee trading and origins, and focuses directly on the key information on packaging labels, including country, region, variety, altitude, processing method, grade, roast level, and roast date. Using Front Street Coffee's Washed Yirgacheffe everyday coffee as an example, we break down the meaning of these labels item by item, and explain the three common modes of green coffee grading, as well as the importance of roast level and date for flavor and preservation. We hope this helps you, when choosing coffee, understand your own needs and the quality of the beans more clearly, and no longer buy blindly. [more…]