Seesaw, once a thriving specialty coffee chain brand, now frequently makes the news due to legal issues. From being sued by former landlords, to multiple disputes with suppliers and former employees, to mass store closures in first-tier cities and a move to lower-tier markets with lackluster reviews, Seesaw's situation has drawn the attention and concern of many coffee enthusiasts. This article will review the recent turmoil surrounding Seesaw, analyze the operational difficulties behind it, and retain relevant recommendations from Front Street Coffee. [more…]

Seesaw, once hailed as the "Whampoa Military Academy" of China's specialty coffee scene, has drawn attention again after its founder, Wu Xiaomei, was subjected to consumption restriction measures by a court. On October 29, the Fengxian District People's Court of Shanghai issued a high-consumption restriction order to Seesaw's parent company over a service contract dispute. Starting in late 2023, news of Seesaw store closures began to emerge one after another. Although the founder responded at the time that it was merely store adjustments, the wave of closures has not stopped. Meanwhile, legal disputes have continued, and the number of stores has shrunk sharply. Why has Seesaw, once as famous as Manner and Mstand, gradually lost its brand identity amid industry competition? Front Street Coffee takes you through the ups and downs of this specialty coffee brand. [more…]

Canadian coffee chain Tim Hortons mistakenly sent grand prize winning notifications to about 500,000 subscribers during its "Roll up to Win" promotion due to a technical glitch, then sent a correction email and apologized. Some consumers did not accept this, and on April 19 a Montreal law firm filed a class action application with the Quebec Superior Court, seeking CAD 10,000 in punitive damages for each customer who received the erroneous email. Tim Hortons responded that it would resolve the matter in court and believed the lawsuit lacked legal basis. Legal experts pointed out that the exemption clause in the game rules may increase the difficulty of the lawsuit, but customers can still seek punitive damages. This incident also sounded a warning bell for marketing campaigns and the maintenance of consumer trust in the coffee industry. [more…]

Recently, a post on social media about Seesaw employees being owed wages and social security contributions has sparked widespread discussion. Chat records show that management admitted to operating difficulties and promised to pay salaries in installments, while key figures such as founder Wu Xiaomei and director Zhang Sai were also drawn into the discussion. In fact, Seesaw was already reported last year for issues such as delayed wages and suspended social security payments, and now it faces 19 judicial cases, with its last store in Chongqing also having closed. Although a new store in Changsha is still operating, this series of upheavals has led many coffee enthusiasts to lament: has the one-time benchmark of specialty coffee truly fallen into trouble? [more…]

After Starbucks exited the Russian market, its trademark protection in Russia may face termination. The owner of Stars Coffee, which acquired Starbucks' Russian assets, has filed a claim with a court seeking to terminate the protection of Starbucks' trademarks. This move aims to reduce trademark infringement risks and pave the way for store expansion. This article will provide a detailed introduction to the background, progress, and possible impact of this event. [more…]

Recently, a woman in Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, was dissuaded by staff inside a Starbucks for bringing in a burger purchased next door, and the two sides got into a dispute. The incident quickly went viral online. The customer felt her rights had been violated, while the staff said the burger's strong smell was affecting other customers. Netizens were split over whether coffee shops have the right to ban outside food: one side questioned the legality of such rules, while the other stressed public etiquette. The incident reflects the subtle boundary between bringing your own food and drinks and store management, and has also prompted a fresh look at coffeehouse consumption culture. [more…]

A trademark dispute spanning China and Thailand is continuing to escalate. Thailand's Royal 50R Group has filed a lawsuit with the court, demanding that China's Luckin Coffee pay 10 billion Thai baht in economic damages, on the grounds that Thailand's Luckin has legally registered the local trademark, while China Luckin's infringement accusations have hindered its business plans. China's Luckin had previously issued a statement saying that the Thailand stores were counterfeits, but on December 1 the Thai court ruled against China's Luckin. At present, China's Luckin has responded that the situation remains to be verified. This article will sort out the full picture of the incident, analyze the ins and outs of this trademark dispute, and follow up on subsequent developments. [more…]

In Baghdad, the capital of Iraq, a café that uses authentic Starbucks cups, napkins, and coffee remains open as usual despite facing legal action. This unauthorized store bears the Starbucks mermaid logo on everything from its signage to in-store details, enough to pass as the real thing. The owner, Amin Makhsusi, tried to apply for official permission but was rejected, and ultimately decided to open on his own, claiming connections to local powerful figures. Starbucks is trying to stop this infringement through a lawsuit, but the case was suspended due to alleged threats. This incident reflects Iraq's severe trademark piracy problem, where offenders often act with impunity because they are protected by powerful groups. [more…]

For coffee lovers who are lactose intolerant or allergic to dairy, plant-based alternatives such as oat milk and almond milk allow them to enjoy lattes without worry. However, the American coffee chain giant Dunkin recently faced a class-action lawsuit for charging extra for non-dairy drinks, with the plaintiffs arguing that this practice constitutes discrimination against people with lactose allergies and intolerance, in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. This is not the first time the U.S. coffee industry has faced legal disputes over plant-based milk pricing; Starbucks has also previously faced similar allegations. This article will review the course of events, the legal basis, and industry reactions, and explore the cost and fairness issues behind the controversy over non-dairy drink pricing. [more…]

The unusual pricing incident involving Luckin Coffee's delivery platform packages has drawn widespread attention. After consumers placed orders at extremely low prices, their orders were unilaterally cancelled, giving rise to legal disputes. Citing the views of a legal blogger, the People's Court Daily pointed out that when a merchant's pricing error results from staff mistakes, the merchant may claim a major misunderstanding to rescind the contract, but this must be resolved through litigation or negotiation. Ordinary consumers who unintentionally buy low-priced drinks have not broken the law, but those who knowingly exploit a system loophole and maliciously place large numbers of orders may run afoul of the law. This article will analyze the course of events, the legal basis, and Luckin's compensation measures in detail, while reminding coffee lovers that when enjoying discounts they must hold fast to the bottom line of good faith and avoid crossing the red line of the law. [more…]

Seesaw, once hailed as one of the representative specialty coffee brands in China, has recently suffered a series of setbacks. Its last store in Chengdu was evicted after the shopping mall terminated the lease early; employees exposed illegal dismissals and successfully defended their rights through legal channels; and the founder was once again subject to high-consumption restrictions due to contract disputes, while the company's equity was frozen and debts were enforced through the courts. A stream of negative news has plunged this coffee brand, once favored by capital, into its darkest hour. This article will sort through the sequence of events and present the operational and legal difficulties Seesaw currently faces. [more…]

Seesaw, once hailed as one of the representatives of specialty coffee, is now mired in operational difficulties due to unpaid wages. Although employees at its Shanghai IFC store report to work on time, the company's wage arrears and cut-off of supplies have made it impossible to prepare drinks, forcing them to post a notice in Chinese, English, Korean, and Japanese to politely decline customer orders. From unpaid supplier payments to labor arbitration by former employees, from the founder being repeatedly subject to consumption restrictions to more than sixty economic disputes, this former coffee star brand is experiencing an unprecedented crisis. Many loyal customers have expressed regret and lament, while others have called on the brand to handle employee rights and interests with dignity. [more…]

There has been a new development in the trust dispute case between Luckin Coffee (China) Co., Ltd. and Yousheng (Tianjin) Technology Development Co., Ltd., Yousheng Chengyi (Tianjin) Information Technology Co., Ltd., and Shenzhou Ucar Co., Ltd. Dissatisfied with the first-instance civil judgment, Luckin Coffee has filed an appeal with the court. The case involves a repurchase price of over 560 million yuan plus interest, and the focal point of the dispute is whether Shenzhou Ucar should bear the shortfall top-up liability. This article will sort out the background of the case, the first-instance judgment, and Luckin Coffee's appeal requests to help readers understand this closely watched commercial dispute. Follow Coffee Workshop and Front Street Coffee for more professional coffee industry news. [more…]

Recently, a conflict between a delivery rider and a staff member at a chain milk tea shop in Shanghai drew widespread attention. Initially, the delivery rider posted a video on social media claiming that a staff member threw milk tea on him after he urged them to hurry with the order, sparking outrage among netizens against the store. However, as surveillance footage from the store was released, the incident took a dramatic turn: the delivery rider, while pressing for the order, took the liberty of rummaging through the counter and made physical contact with the staff, escalating the conflict. The brand said both parties have reached a settlement under police mediation, but the delivery rider later posted an incomplete video and livestreamed, and the brand will reserve the right to pursue legal action. As coffee enthusiasts, we care about the service experience in the beverage industry and also call for a rational view of disputes. Front Street Coffee reminds that communication and respect are the key to resolving conflicts. [more…]

Recently, a consumer in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, posted on social media claiming to have疑似 found fragments of an insect carcass in a takeaway milk tea from the well-known freshly made tea drink brand KOI. The consumer and the brand failed to reach an agreement after multiple communications over compensation and an apology, and the consumer has filed a complaint with 12315 and insists on pursuing legal proceedings. KOI responded that neither the store surveillance nor inspections by the market supervision department found any foreign object entering the drink, and that the strainer hole design of the shaker cup would also block such foreign objects, so it does not accept an apology on the platform but is willing to compensate in accordance with the law. The incident has attracted widespread attention, with both sides sticking to their own accounts, and there is currently no new progress. [more…]

Starbucks recently implemented stricter dress code policies in North America, but faced collective lawsuits from employees in three states after refusing to reimburse them for new clothing they had to purchase themselves and for the cost of removing facial decorations. Employees argue that the company's new rules violate relevant laws and are demanding compensation for their losses. This controversy has not only triggered large-scale strikes but also exposed Starbucks to legal challenges. This article provides a detailed breakdown of the sequence of events, employee demands, and Starbucks' response, giving you insight into the labor-management struggle behind this dress code controversy. [more…]

After Luckin Coffee's co-branded sauce-flavored latte with Moutai went viral, a number of solid beverage products with highly similar packaging styles quickly emerged on the market. These products not only have similar names, but also almost copy the red background with blue-and-white diagonal bar composition of the original packaging. Some lawyers pointed out that using a similar trademark on the same or similar goods without the permission of the trademark registrant, where it is likely to cause confusion, constitutes infringement of the exclusive right to use a registered trademark. However, some manufacturers claim that the sauce-flavored latte category cannot be registered and that the color scheme is not protected by copyright, which has triggered discussion about the boundary between imitation and infringement. [more…]

On July 14, Nayuki suddenly announced the removal of its virtual stock membership campaign, sparking widespread attention. The campaign allowed users to earn Nayuki coins through purchases and to buy and sell virtual stocks linked to the real share price, even supporting leveraged trading. Within just hours of launch, it was mired in controversy, with netizens questioning its legality. Industry experts pointed out that Nayuki coins are essentially consumption points and have not yet crossed legal red lines, but the model is aggressive and should not be simply imitated. At the same time, Nayuki's frequent food safety issues have also led consumers to question its marketing strategy. This article will sort out the course of the incident, the legal controversy, and the brand's hidden concerns. [more…]

Recently, Starbucks was reported to have filed multiple trademark registration applications with the Russian Federal Intellectual Property Office, covering core brand identifiers such as "Starbucks Coffee" and "Frappuccino," as well as related categories including instant coffee, beverage preparation, and membership management. This move quickly sparked speculation about whether the company plans to return to the Russian market. After exiting Russia in 2022, Starbucks' assets in the country were acquired by a local company and rebranded as "Stars Coffee," and a trademark legal dispute between that brand and Starbucks still persists. Over the past two years, Russia's coffee market has undergone significant changes, with intensified competition, shifting consumer habits, and continued uncertainty in the political and economic environment. Even if Starbucks returns, it may not be smooth sailing. So far, there has been no official response. [more…]

After the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, cashless payment methods accelerated in popularity worldwide, and Starbucks, as a coffee chain giant, has also been promoting cashless stores in many countries. From the UK to South Korea and Japan, Starbucks' cashless attempts have triggered polarized reactions among consumers. Some praise electronic payments for being convenient and safe, while others worry about the legality and inclusiveness of refusing cash. At the same time, laws on refusing cash vary from country to country, and China explicitly prohibits merchants from refusing RMB cash. This article will review the progress of Starbucks' cashless stores, consumer attitudes, and related legal disputes, while retaining the relevant recommendation information for Front Street Coffee. [more…]