Following the case of Shuyi Burning Grass Jelly, the Shanghai Consumer Council on March 13 once again turned its attention to the internet-famous tea beverage brand More Yogurt, focusing on the ingredient composition of its "Mango Yogurt Smoothie." Testing by the Consumer Council found that the drink contained only a small amount of yogurt yet had unusually high fat content, and despite being labeled as having no added sugar, sucrose and maltose were still detected. The Consumer Council questioned the source of this excess fat and sugar and demanded that More Yogurt explain to consumers "what was added." The incident quickly sparked widespread discussion and trended on Weibo. This article sorts through the testing data and science popularization information released by the Consumer Council to present the full picture of the incident. For readers interested in coffee and beverage industry trends, Front Street Coffee also continues to follow such food safety topics and advocates transparent consumption. [more…]

Recently, the Hong Kong Consumer Council published a bottled water test report in the magazine "Choice," pointing out that the bromate levels in samples of Nongfu Spring and Ganten reached the European Union's limit for natural mineral water, sparking widespread attention. Nongfu Spring immediately commissioned a lawyer to send a legal letter to the Consumer Council, demanding written clarification, an apology, and the elimination of the impact; Ganten also stated that it had made representations through its legal department and emphasized that its product was at the critical value of the EU standard rather than exceeding it. The China Beverage Industry Association said it would issue a response later. The Consumer Council reiterated that none of the 30 samples were found to contain harmful substances exceeding WHO guidelines, and that the article focused on value for money and the environmental impact of plastic bottles, and that all samples could be safely consumed. [more…]

Specialty coffee consumption continues to heat up globally, with particularly rapid growth in emerging markets such as China and India. Buying coffee beans online has become a new trend, new brands keep emerging, and market competition is becoming increasingly fierce. Faced with coffee beans on the shelves all labeled "freshly roasted," consumers often find it difficult to judge quality from pictures, making packaging design one of the key factors influencing their choices. However, packaging is only the first step in attracting new customers. What truly determines whether a brand can develop over the long term is a sustainable philosophy, an authentic brand story, and consistently excellent coffee quality. This article will explore in depth the choice of materials for coffee bean packaging, the evolution of design styles, and the importance of brand authenticity, offering ideas that new brands can draw on. [more…]

Recently, a Xinyang netizen exposed that a drink purchased at a Luckin Coffee store on campus had a fly settled at the bottom, sparking widespread attention. The consumer refused the store's initial offer of a free drink and a complimentary beverage, demanding compensation in accordance with the law. Luckin's after-sales service called multiple times, offering coupons, and was even accused of implying that the consumer had put the foreign object in themselves. In the end, the employee involved was fired, and the consumer received 500 yuan in compensation. This is not the first time Luckin has been embroiled in a food safety scandal; there have previously been incidents involving foreign objects such as work badges and ants. At a time when competition in the tea beverage market is white-hot, a brand's sincerity in handling problems has become key to consumer trust. This article reviews the course of the incident and the legal basis, and includes related recommendations from Front Street Coffee. [more…]

The Hong Kong Consumer Council previously published an article on bottled water testing, pointing to the bromate levels in samples of Nongfu Spring and Ganten as reaching the upper limit of EU standards, which immediately sparked a public opinion storm. Nongfu Spring quickly commissioned a lawyer to send a letter demanding clarification and an apology, and Ganten also issued a statement in response to the misinterpretation of the test results. Under public pressure, Nongfu Spring's stock price continued to decline, and its market value shrank significantly within two days. The company then sent an executive director to Hong Kong for face-to-face negotiations. Today, the Consumer Council published a clarification on its official website, reclassifying the samples as "natural drinking water" and re-scoring them, while also expressing regret. Nongfu Spring responded that its products fully comply with standards and are safe to drink, and its stock price rose in response. [more…]

Recently, a female consumer in Hefei, Anhui Province, found a cockroach at the bottom of a cup after buying milk tea through a food delivery platform. Even more shockingly, after she exposed the incident on Weibo, she received threatening private messages from an anonymous person. The incident quickly escalated and became a trending topic on Weibo, with 84.574 million views. An investigation found that the shop involved was not the authentic "COCO都可" but a counterfeit store called "与COCO茶饮". The merchant initially refused compensation and accused the consumer of extortion, but later expressed willingness to apologize, compensate, and fire the store manager. This incident not only exposed the difficulty of identifying counterfeit brands on food delivery platforms but also once again sounded the alarm for food safety. Front Street Coffee reminds you that when encountering similar problems, you must preserve evidence at the first opportunity and defend your rights in accordance with the law. [more…]

Recently, an employee at a Heytea store in Shijiazhuang searched for a customer's phone number and added her on WeChat to harass her, sparking widespread attention. After the incident came to light, Heytea quickly fired the employee and apologized and compensated the affected customer. This individual case not only exposes the lack of customer privacy protection training at tea beverage brands, but also once again brings the topic of consumer personal information security to the forefront. With the Regulations on the Implementation of the Law on the Protection of Consumer Rights and Interests officially taking effect in July 2024, the boundaries for business operators collecting and using personal information have become clearer, and the cost of violations has risen significantly. This article will review the course of the incident, the brand's response, and the relevant legal provisions. [more…]

When a cup of fortified Purple Grape Jelly drink was almost finished, a large insect was found wrapped in the pearl toppings—an experience that left the consumer both nauseated and frightened. Even more surprising, during compensation negotiations with the ChaPanda merchant, although the other party eventually verbally agreed to pay 1,000 yuan, they required the consumer to sign an agreement and delete related posts and comments. The consumer believed this move was an attempt to portray them as a malicious claimant and refused to sign. Both sides stuck to their own accounts, and the local food and drug administration has also intervened and summoned the parties. How will this food safety dispute ultimately end? What obstacles did the consumer encounter on the path to defending their rights? This article sorts out the entire process of the incident for you. [more…]

The unusual pricing incident involving Luckin Coffee's delivery platform packages has drawn widespread attention. After consumers placed orders at extremely low prices, their orders were unilaterally cancelled, giving rise to legal disputes. Citing the views of a legal blogger, the People's Court Daily pointed out that when a merchant's pricing error results from staff mistakes, the merchant may claim a major misunderstanding to rescind the contract, but this must be resolved through litigation or negotiation. Ordinary consumers who unintentionally buy low-priced drinks have not broken the law, but those who knowingly exploit a system loophole and maliciously place large numbers of orders may run afoul of the law. This article will analyze the course of events, the legal basis, and Luckin's compensation measures in detail, while reminding coffee lovers that when enjoying discounts they must hold fast to the bottom line of good faith and avoid crossing the red line of the law. [more…]

Recently, a Nayuki store in Linping District, Hangzhou, was exposed after a consumer allegedly found a thumbnail-sized blue-black stone in a drink, and when the consumer sought compensation, the store manager instead accused them of extortion and fraud. After the customer called the police and reviewed the mall’s surveillance footage, the video fully recorded the entire process of picking up the order, drinking it, and spitting out the stone, but the store did not provide surveillance of the production process. Nayuki’s official customer service refused media interviews, and the phone service at the store involved was suspended. The incident has drawn attention to food safety and the protection of consumer rights by catering brands. [more…]

A super value 5-time card launched on Luckin Coffee's Tmall flagship store quickly triggered a buying frenzy because it was priced as low as 13.77 yuan for any 5 cups chosen from 15 classic drinks. However, in the early hours of the next day, many consumers had their orders forcibly refunded by the platform on the grounds of "no longer wanted" without any refund operation on their part, and some, although shown as shipped, did not receive the electronic vouchers. Luckin later explained that a system configuration error had triggered automatic refunds and offered a 32-yuan drink voucher as compensation. But some consumers were not convinced, believing that the brand's unilateral cancellation of the contract amounted to a breach of contract or even fraud, and have filed lawsuits in court demanding reasonable compensation. The incident exposed the performance risks in the sale of electronic discount vouchers and the issue of consumer rights protection. [more…]

Starbucks' "0.01 yuan for two Flat Whites" promotion sparked controversy after coupon distribution failed and orders were automatically refunded, triggering a wave of dissatisfaction and complaints from netizens, with the Shanghai Consumer Council stepping in to communicate. Starbucks China denied allegations of "order cancellation" and "zero-cost customer acquisition," stating that it had fulfilled over 10,000 orders, while more than 900,000 orders were not completed. Lawyers pointed out that once consumers pay successfully, a contract is formed, and Starbucks' unilateral cancellation may constitute a breach of contract. The incident is still unfolding, and the Consumer Council has not yet released the investigation results. [more…]

Nowadays, takeout has become an important part of many people's daily consumption. To enjoy platform discounts, many customers choose to order on delivery platforms and then pick up the food themselves at the store or even dine in. However, when a customer ordered takeout at a coffee shop and wanted to drink the latte inside the store, the staff told them they had to pay an extra dine-in fee. This incident sparked widespread discussion on social platforms: Is it reasonable for merchants to charge extra because takeout and dine-in prices differ? How should the consumer experience be safeguarded? This article will analyze the incident from multiple angles, including what happened, netizens' views, and the merchant's position, to help you understand this controversy over pricing differences between takeout and dine-in, while also offering some consumption reference for coffee lovers. [more…]

Starbucks' Oleato olive oil coffee line, which sparked controversy after its debut in Italy, has now officially landed in the U.S. market. The product aims to attract health-conscious consumers by adding olive oil, but it has drawn complaints in both Italy and the U.S. about its greasy mouthfeel and clumps of congealed oil. American netizens have even jokingly dubbed it "lard coffee." Although Starbucks plans to roll it out to the UK, Japan, and the Middle East, market acceptance remains to be seen. This article takes a detailed look at the background behind the launch of this product line, consumer feedback, and its future prospects. [more…]

Starbucks hosted a high-profile exclusive dinner at its Shanghai Roastery, with founder Schultz personally taking the stage to promote the Oleato olive oil coffee series. However, this lavish promotional push failed to generate the expected splash among consumers. Meanwhile, Luckin's newly launched Huangshan Maofeng Latte also suffered a reputational flop. Behind the密集 new product launches from chain coffee brands, is it a lack of innovation or consumer fatigue? This article will take an in-depth look at the recent market performance of new coffee products and explore how brands can find the right R&D direction amid fierce competition. [more…]

Recently, a consumer in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, posted on social media claiming to have疑似 found fragments of an insect carcass in a takeaway milk tea from the well-known freshly made tea drink brand KOI. The consumer and the brand failed to reach an agreement after multiple communications over compensation and an apology, and the consumer has filed a complaint with 12315 and insists on pursuing legal proceedings. KOI responded that neither the store surveillance nor inspections by the market supervision department found any foreign object entering the drink, and that the strainer hole design of the shaker cup would also block such foreign objects, so it does not accept an apology on the platform but is willing to compensate in accordance with the law. The incident has attracted widespread attention, with both sides sticking to their own accounts, and there is currently no new progress. [more…]

In recent years, luxury brands branching out into coffee shops has become an undeniable trend. From Vivienne Westwood to Coach, from Dior to Tiffany, numerous high-end consumer brands have opened cafés or launched limited-time pop-ups in cities such as Shanghai and Beijing. These venues sell themselves on exquisite décor, branded-logo tableware, and photogenic desserts, with prices ranging from twenty yuan to over a hundred, attempting to close the distance with the general public through a cup of coffee. Yet consumer reviews are mixed: some find it worth the money, while others see the products as perfunctory and the pricing as artificially inflated. This article will examine the market logic and consumer response behind this phenomenon. [more…]

Recently, a customer found a screw sunk at the bottom of an Iced Orange Americano purchased at a Manner store, and the incident quickly spread on social media. According to Manner employees, the screw was suspected to have come from the ice guard plate of the store's ice machine, possibly falling into the ice storage bin because it was not tightened during assembly, and eventually ending up in the drink. After the incident, the brand required all stores to check the screws on their ice machines and report with photos, while the employee involved may face dismissal and a heavy fine. Online opinion was divided over whether the consumer should complain and seek compensation: some sympathized with the worker and suggested settling privately, while others insisted that mistakes must be held accountable and that the consumer's rights protection is reasonable and lawful. As of press time, the compensation plan remains unclear, but the incident has already triggered widespread discussion about equipment management and employee responsibility at coffee shops. [more…]

Ordering through mini-programs is quick and convenient, and you can even get coupons, but once you place a wrong order and want a refund, you may run into obstacle after obstacle. Recently, a blogger mistakenly ordered 17 cups of coffee through the Luckin mini-program. Within one minute, they tried to cancel, only to find that the mini-program did not display the store’s phone number, while the headquarters customer service kept passing them back and forth through an intelligent robot. In the end, they had no choice but to bear the loss themselves. This incident struck a chord with many netizens, and quite a few shared similar experiences. Consumers are calling for store contact information to be made public or for the self-service refund function to be improved, while Luckin staff also said that stores cannot directly process refunds and that the procedure is cumbersome, expressing hope that the system can be optimized. When convenience and after-sales service become disconnected, how should brands balance efficiency and consumer rights? [more…]

Recently, a video about a 17-yuan milk tea from "Grandpa Doesn't Make Tea" that was unopened yet only half full sparked heated discussion online. A consumer in Guangdong reported that the First Love Rose Green Grape Fruit Tea they purchased had an opaque upper half on the cup, making it hard to judge the capacity from the outside; only after flipping it over did they discover the drink was only half full. Around issues such as whether no-ice drinks should by default not fill the cup and whether store serving standards are uniform, netizens clearly held divergent views. At the same time, multiple consumers posted weighing results and flashlight inspection results, pointing out that insufficient portions of this brand's drinks are not an isolated case. The brand and stores have responded, saying they are verifying and handling the matter. [more…]