Why do coffee shops charge more to dine in than to order delivery?

A customer placed a delivery order at a coffee shop, picked it up, then sat down to finish the hot latte because the store was quiet and the weather was cold. Staff stopped her and said drinking inside required an extra dine-in fee, since the delivery price and the in-store price differ. The woman questioned the surcharge because the latte came from the same shop.

Her receipt showed the delivery amount paid was in fact lower than the dine-in price. The clash between platform discounts and in-store pricing has become a common friction point for coffee shops: customers collect coupons and order delivery to cut costs, while merchants treat delivery and dine-in as separate price tiers tied to different costs.

Today, food delivery has become an important part of many people's daily consumption. To enjoy platform discounts, many customers choose to order on delivery platforms and then pick up in-store or even dine in. However, when a customer ordered delivery from a coffee shop and wanted to finish the latte inside the store, the staff told her she needed to pay an extra dine-in fee. This incident sparked widespread discussion on social media: Is it reasonable for merchants to charge extra because delivery and dine-in prices differ? How should the consumer experience be protected? This article will analyze the incident from multiple angles, including what happened, netizens' views, and the merchant's position, to help you understand this controversy over delivery versus dine-in pricing differences, while also offering some consumption reference for coffee lovers.

▲

Click to follow | Daily specialty coffee culture magazine Coffee Workshop

For contemporary people, food delivery has long been integrated into daily life, and many young people even rely on delivery for all three meals a day. However, delivery prices are not low nowadays. To control food expenses, many customers collect coupons through various channels before ordering, striving to enjoy a satisfying meal at a more cost-effective price.

Sometimes when merchants run promotions on delivery platforms, some consumers deliberately choose to place delivery orders and then dine in at the store, thereby reducing their dining costs.

Recently, a netizen placed a delivery order at a coffee shop and then went to the store to pick it up. Seeing that there were few customers in the store, and because the weather was relatively cold that day, she planned to sit for a while and finish the hot latte before leaving. However, the staff who noticed this immediately stopped her and told her that if she wanted to drink the latte inside the store, she would need to pay an additional dine-in fee.

The customer was puzzled: the hot latte she was about to drink was ordered on this store's delivery platform, and it was the store's signature latte, not a drink from somewhere else, so why should the merchant charge an extra dine-in fee?

The staff explained that it was because the delivery price and the dine-in price of the coffee were different.

From the order the customer posted, the amount actually paid for delivery was indeed lower than the dine-in price of the store's drinks.

From this perspective, it seems somewhat reasonable for the merchant to charge an additional dine-in fee, but many netizens did not approve of the merchant's approach and thought the merchant was being too petty.

"It's the dead of winter and the store isn't even full. Maybe the person ordering is a regular customer. Not letting her sit is too much." "Are they copying Japan and South Korea? Over there, dine-in and takeout prices and taxes are different. I don't believe our taxes here are different."

As consumers, whether for dine-in or delivery, they are buying this store's product, so dining in the store is not unreasonable. If a merchant treats customers differently simply because they ordered through a different channel, this behavior will seriously affect the customer experience, damage the merchant's good image and reputation, and may even make the customer never want to spend money at the store again because of such a small incident.

However, some netizens also believe that it is understandable for merchants to charge a dine-in fee to consumers who ordered delivery. The amount consumers actually pay for delivery is itself lower than the dine-in price, and on top of that, the delivery platform takes a commission, so the merchant may actually earn very little from delivery orders, or even lose money. Therefore, when consumers ask to enjoy their delivery order inside the store, it is not hard to understand why merchants add a dine-in fee to make up the difference between delivery and dine-in.

Judging from feedback on social media, it is not uncommon for consumers to order delivery and then dine in at the store. Most people do this because coupons can be used on delivery platforms, or because merchants have promotions on delivery platforms, making delivery prices generally more cost-effective than dine-in prices.

But for merchants, if consumers have already enjoyed a price discount through the delivery platform, they should not also enjoy the dine-in service corresponding to the product's original price at that discounted price. Therefore, when facing customers who want to "game the system" through delivery platforms, some merchants explicitly refuse to let customers place delivery orders in the store, or refuse to let customers who ordered delivery dine in at the store, and a very small number of merchants ask customers to pay an additional dine-in fee to cover the difference.

Image source: Xiaohongshu

Disclaimer: Some images in this article are from the internet. For some content on the website, such as images, we will respect the original author's copyright and indicate the source. However, due to the large volume, a few images and texts may not yet be credited. Please forgive us. If the original author has any dispute, they may contact the website for handling. Once verified, we will correct it immediately. Compiled and edited by "Coffee Workshop." Please indicate the source when reposting. If there is any infringement, please inform us for deletion. Thank you~!

The above content is compiled by CoffeeHunters, a coffee news website.