Recently, a newly opened seaside coffee shop in Qingdao sparked controversy over a recommendation post featuring "lemon trees outside the window and the azure sea." Some netizens, drawn by the hype, visited the shop only to discover that the coveted sea view photo was actually a decorative painting hanging on the shop's wall. The recommendation post was accused of misleading consumers, and multiple accounts on social media platforms used similar images and text to recommend the shop, fueling speculation that "the shop was staging the whole thing." The owner responded that the recommendation posts were spontaneously published by customers, the hanging painting was just ordinary decor, and they never instructed anyone to take photos for promotion. Due to online harassment, they have decided to report the matter to the police. Lawyers pointed out that if the shop participated in or instigated the posting of false scene promotions, it would constitute false advertising and entail liability; if the posts were independently published by customers without the shop's involvement, it would not be illegal. The incident highlights the boundary issues surrounding the authenticity of shop-visit content on social media platforms. [more…]

A coffee shop sparked strong public outrage and a wave of collective negative reviews after launching a "1-yuan beauty coffee, choose one of three" group-buy package that required purchasers to be women under 35 during specific evening hours, with a note stating "if the boss doesn't think you're pretty, you need to pay the difference." The shop once explained it wanted customers to match the store's style, but this failed to quell the controversy, and it was subsequently taken offline by the platform and had its social media account canceled. Recently, the shop relaunched, and although the controversial package had disappeared, netizens once again gave low ratings, causing it to be taken offline a second time. A lawyer from Legal Daily pointed out that the package was suspected of violating the Advertising Law and the Civil Code, while the netizens' excessive criticism may constitute cyberbullying. Front Street Coffee reminds that both merchant promotion and platform review need to strictly adhere to legal bottom lines. [more…]

Cantonese people's beloved white cut chicken has actually been turned into a cup of coffee? Recently, a video of "white cut chicken coffee" quickly went viral online, sparking heated discussion among many netizens. This drink, which mixes chicken, ginger, scallions, and garlic with milk and espresso, comes from an autism charity coffee shop in Guangzhou. It was originally an impromptu idea created during filming by employees and an autistic barista, intended to draw public attention to the autistic community in a lighthearted way. However, as the video was maliciously edited and widely circulated, criticism and abuse escalated continuously, deeply affecting the shop and the barista, who ultimately had to delete the original video. This article will reconstruct the course of events, explore the story and reflections behind this cup of coffee, and also recommend high-quality coffee products from the Front Street brand for coffee lovers. [more…]

Recently, a clarification post about a café at a scenic spot in Qingdao sparked widespread discussion on social media, with comments quickly climbing to thousands. The incident began when a tourist claiming to be a university student posted about an unpleasant experience at the café, saying they were indirectly driven out by staff for not making a purchase, and later claimed to have been insulted. However, as the business came forward to recount what actually happened, the situation took a turn, and the original poster eventually apologized voluntarily. This controversy not only reflects the differing perceptions between consumers and service venues regarding occupying seats, spending, and service, but also prompts a reexamination of the operational difficulties faced by cafés at tourist attractions during holidays. Today, Front Street Coffee walks you through the full story. [more…]

A coffee shop known for being a photo hotspot has sparked widespread discussion on social media after posting a notice stating "only customers aged 10 and above are served." The owner says the move was a last resort, citing frequent incidents of children making noise, damaging facilities, and even creating safety hazards. Some parents are puzzled by the rule, arguing that 10-year-olds already have some self-control, while some netizens question whether it amounts to discrimination against children. In response, lawyers point out that businesses have the right to operate independently and can set reasonable rules based on their positioning, which does not constitute discrimination, but they suggest clearly explaining the reasons to gain understanding. Behind the incident lies the dilemma cafes face in balancing ambiance and customer experience. [more…]

Recently, a surveillance video from a Luckin Coffee store in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, has gone viral online. The video shows a customer who, after waiting 25 minutes, demanded that the staff prioritize making their drink. When refused, the customer lost control of their emotions and verbally attacked the staff, even mocking their education and appearance. Unexpectedly, the two employees remained calm and restrained throughout, responding with a composed attitude. The incident sparked widespread discussion among netizens, with many praising the employees' professionalism, while others suggested the brand should give them a "grievance award." The employees involved said they have called the police, hoping to make more people realize that insulting others comes at a cost. [more…]

No sooner had the Qingming holiday ended than Starbucks was already busy preparing for its next round of in-store campaigns. This time, it is not a collaboration with a popular IP, but the annual, uniquely positioned-in-the-zongzi-world Starbucks Crystal Dumpling, which is about to hit the shelves again. Mocked by netizens as "a zongzi that is not a zongzi," the Starbucks Crystal Dumpling, branded with the label of "weird flavors," has once again returned to consumers' view thanks to Starbucks' persistence. According to information circulating on social platforms, this year's Crystal Dumplings follow last year's format: one box of eight, four flavors. Compared with last year, this year's lineup emphasizes a colorful visual route, with crystal-clear outer skins wrapping brightly colored fillings, looking at first glance like rainbow candy. The most eye-catching of all is the sky-blue "Coconut Wave" in the upper right corner. The promotional copy says it uses imported coconut and tastes "as blue and free as the ocean," yet netizens have described it as so abstract that it is hard to imagine. Blue food has always challenged the appetite, and even though the ingredients list shows that food coloring is used, many people still blurt out that it "looks even less appetizing." As for flavors, Starbucks seems to have listened to outside opinions. This year's four new products are all mainly fruit-flavored. Although they are still unconventional compared with traditional zongzi, netizens believe this may be the edition with "relatively normal flavors" in history. Whether improved looks and adjusted flavors can stir up the desire to buy is something most people are still taking a wait-and-see attitude toward. After all, Starbucks Crystal Dumplings are constantly criticized for being unpalatable, yet there are always people willing to pay for this "evil legend of the zongzi world." And in this, the salesmanship of Starbucks employees cannot be underestimated. During every Crystal Dumpling sales period, staff members strongly recommend them to customers ordering at the bar, and in order to sell a box of gift packages, they can truly [more…]