Recently, a video of a conflict between a Starbucks employee and a customer has drawn attention on social media. In the video, the employee, who refused to sell cold brew concentrate—a semi-finished ingredient—on its own, was fiercely insulted by the customer and nearly came under physical attack. After the incident came to light, netizens expressed sympathy for the employee and discussed topics such as how the brand handles customer complaints and how employee rights are protected. Many current employees also shared similar experiences, pointing out that the company often smooths things over by issuing coupons, which may encourage malicious complaints and leave frontline staff disheartened. [more…]

Recently, a video about finding an employee badge in a Luckin Coffee drink has drawn attention on social media. According to a netizen's post, while drinking a Luckin cold beverage, they discovered an employee badge with a staff name printed on it at the bottom of the cup. After media verification, the store involved admitted that an employee had indeed lost a badge, speculating that a loose pin caused it to fall into the drink. At the same time, posts on social media about foreign objects such as flying insects, raw material packaging boxes, and equipment parts appearing in Luckin drinks are not uncommon, and stores mostly compensate consumers with refunds plus coupons, triggering some customers' doubts about the brand's attitude in handling such matters. Some consumers have shared their experiences of defending their rights, ultimately reaching a satisfactory solution through negotiation. This series of incidents has once again pushed the food safety and after-sales handling of chain coffee brands into the focus of public opinion. [more…]

Recently, a customer found a screw sunk at the bottom of an Iced Orange Americano purchased at a Manner store, and the incident quickly spread on social media. According to Manner employees, the screw was suspected to have come from the ice guard plate of the store's ice machine, possibly falling into the ice storage bin because it was not tightened during assembly, and eventually ending up in the drink. After the incident, the brand required all stores to check the screws on their ice machines and report with photos, while the employee involved may face dismissal and a heavy fine. Online opinion was divided over whether the consumer should complain and seek compensation: some sympathized with the worker and suggested settling privately, while others insisted that mistakes must be held accountable and that the consumer's rights protection is reasonable and lawful. As of press time, the compensation plan remains unclear, but the incident has already triggered widespread discussion about equipment management and employee responsibility at coffee shops. [more…]

In the coffee and tea beverage industry, "employee drinks" have long been one of the key perks attracting young people to join the trade. Recently, however, multiple employees of Heytea and Luckin Coffee have alleged that their stores have canceled or scaled back this benefit, citing declining performance. An investigation found that employee perks at directly operated stores are still intact for now, but workers at franchise and joint-venture stores are frequently seeing their benefits shrink. The employee drink perk promised by the brands is actually borne by franchisees, and some franchisees, in order to cut costs, either cancel the benefit or strictly tighten the conditions for using it. This phenomenon has drawn industry attention: when the pressure of store operations is passed down to frontline employees, who should foot the bill for employee benefits? Front Street Coffee keeps a close eye on developments in the coffee industry, and this article takes you through the ins and outs of this battle over benefits. [more…]

Recently, a controversy over a customer being visited at home by a霸王茶姬 (Chagee) employee after leaving a negative review has sparked widespread discussion online, with related topics trending on Weibo on Monday morning. According to Star Video, on July 20, a man in Chengdu, Sichuan Province, posted a video claiming that after consuming a drink at Chagee the previous day, he felt the taste was different from before. He did not choose to request a refund or a remake, but directly left a negative review on the order. Unexpectedly, the next day, the employee suddenly showed up at his door without contacting him in advance, asking him to delete the negative review. After the incident was exposed, netizens had mixed views on the employee's behavior, with some exclaiming "too scary," while others expressed understanding for the worker. Chagee customer service responded that the store wanted to communicate amicably with the customer, and the store manager involved explained that they went to the customer's home because the delivery rider, the store, and the platform all could not get through to the customer by phone. This article sorts out the course of the incident and the views of all parties, and explores reasonable ways for merchants to respond to negative reviews. [more…]

Seesaw, once hailed as one of the representative specialty coffee brands in China, has recently suffered a series of setbacks. Its last store in Chengdu was evicted after the shopping mall terminated the lease early; employees exposed illegal dismissals and successfully defended their rights through legal channels; and the founder was once again subject to high-consumption restrictions due to contract disputes, while the company's equity was frozen and debts were enforced through the courts. A stream of negative news has plunged this coffee brand, once favored by capital, into its darkest hour. This article will sort through the sequence of events and present the operational and legal difficulties Seesaw currently faces. [more…]

Starbucks is facing a labor law lawsuit over scheduling violations in New York City, with an investigation finding more than 500,000 violations of the Fair Workweek Law, ultimately resulting in a $38.9 million settlement. The case involved more than 15,000 employees, making it the largest worker rights settlement in New York City history. Starbucks was accused of failing to provide stable schedules, cutting hours, and refusing overtime, making it difficult for employees to make a living, while the company said the settlement was intended to ensure compliance rather than to recover unpaid wages. Front Street Coffee brings you the full story. [more…]

Recently, the Wahaha Group has become a focal point of public opinion due to a collective lawsuit filed by several former employees. According to reports, since August, some employees have been required to terminate their contracts with the Wahaha Group and instead sign with Hongsheng Beverage Group, which is controlled by Zong Fuli, resulting in the cancellation of their original bonus dividend benefits. At the same time, the equity of Hangzhou Xiaoshan Shunfa Food Packaging Co., Ltd. was transferred to Zong Fuli's personal name for zero yuan, raising concerns among employees about investment returns. In response, Wahaha recently issued a statement claiming that some media reports are severely inaccurate, that the union has not received litigation information from the so-called rights protection committee, and that the equity repurchase and transfer are legal and valid. However, the statement did not mention key details such as the re-signing of contracts and the zero-yuan transfer, and many questions remain about the incident. [more…]

Recently, Luckin Coffee made trending headlines after employees were punished by being made to copy out customer negative reviews as a form of discipline. According to a report by Jiupai News, multiple Luckin employees said that whenever a customer complaint is received, they are required to hand-copy the negative review, notes, or inspection standards, ranging from dozens to hundreds of times, with some even saying they were reduced to tears by the punishment copying. Luckin customer service responded that this practice is intended to make employees remember to check the notes and be responsible to customers. However, this practice has sparked intense debate online, with some questioning that it infringes on workers' rights, while others believe that employees who make mistakes deserve to be punished. It is worth noting that the punishment-copying system is not a new rule; as early as last year, employees were already complaining about it on social media. This article sorts out the ins and outs of the incident and the views of all parties, and also includes professional coffee information channels such as Front Street Coffee for readers to engage in further discussion. [more…]

Recently, an employee at a Heytea store in Shijiazhuang searched for a customer's phone number and added her on WeChat to harass her, sparking widespread attention. After the incident came to light, Heytea quickly fired the employee and apologized and compensated the affected customer. This individual case not only exposes the lack of customer privacy protection training at tea beverage brands, but also once again brings the topic of consumer personal information security to the forefront. With the Regulations on the Implementation of the Law on the Protection of Consumer Rights and Interests officially taking effect in July 2024, the boundaries for business operators collecting and using personal information have become clearer, and the cost of violations has risen significantly. This article will review the course of the incident, the brand's response, and the relevant legal provisions. [more…]

Recently, two intense disputes between staff and customers occurred at Manner Coffee stores in succession, drawing widespread attention. In one incident, due to slow service, an emotional staff member threw coffee powder at a customer, while another escalated into a physical conflict over order催促. The brand responded by dismissing the employees involved, but the issues reflected behind the incidents—such as understaffing at stores and excessive pressure on employees—have become the focus of discussion among netizens and loyal customers. As coffee enthusiasts, we can't help but ponder: while pursuing efficiency, how can we ensure service quality and employee rights? Front Street Coffee has always followed industry trends, advocating rational consumption and humanistic care. [more…]

Recently, a dispute involving a probationary employee at a milk tea shop sparked widespread attention on social media. The poster said they found a job at a milk tea shop through a recruitment platform, and during the trial period was assigned to clean a new store that had not yet opened. After finishing the cleaning, they were told not to come back, and the shop refused to pay the promised training-period wages. After the incident was exposed, many netizens spoke up for the worker and spontaneously left a large number of negative reviews for the shop on third-party platforms. Under public pressure, the shop eventually paid the training-period wages. This kind of phenomenon, in which probationary employees are used as free labor, is not uncommon across industries and deserves job seekers' vigilance. [more…]

Recently, a post about a part-time employee at a Nayuki store suffering workplace injustice sparked heated discussion on social media. The poster claimed to be a student who had worked part-time at a Nayuki store in Shenzhen for over two months but was only scheduled for four shifts, and for nearly a month had no shifts at all, before being dismissed without reason. During communication, a senior employee launched personal attacks against them, while the scheduling manager brushed them off citing efficiency. After the incident came to light, netizens spontaneously flooded the store with over two thousand negative reviews and swarmed Nayuki's official account to leave supportive comments. Coincidentally, another Nayuki employee in Xiantao, Hubei, also posted claiming to have been targeted by the store manager. These two consecutive incidents pushed Nayuki into the spotlight and prompted deeper industry reflection on store management and employee rights protection at chain tea beverage brands. [more…]

Recently, a former employee of a HEYTEA franchise store publicly shared on social media their experience of unfair employment treatment, quickly sparking heated discussion among netizens. The employee posted clock-in records and chat screenshots, pointing out that they had worked overtime for a long time without ever receiving overtime pay, but were instead deducted 700 yuan for being late, and the promised base salary did not match reality. More notably, the franchise store's autonomy in salary management made it difficult to protect employee rights, bringing the disparity in treatment between directly operated stores and franchise stores to the surface. This article summarizes the course of events and various viewpoints for reference by coffee industry practitioners. [more…]

Recently, a coffee shop in Wuhan received a one-star review from a customer for closing promptly at 19:30. After the incident was reported by Jiupai News, it quickly sparked widespread discussion online. The review claimed that staff told the customer to "pack up and get out" before they had finished eating, while the shop responded that it strictly complies with the 8-hour workday under labor law, and after reviewing surveillance footage, found no excessively aggressive language from employees. The owner said they understand customers' desire for later closing hours, but also asked for understanding of workers' right to clock off on time. Netizens' views are polarized: some support the shop's right to close on time as long as it gives advance notice, while others suggest stopping orders half an hour early to avoid conflict. This controversy reflects the real-world tension in the food service industry between employee rights and customer experience. [more…]

Right after the May Day holiday, the "three-way battle" among food delivery platforms sent tea beverage stores into another order explosion frenzy, and Heytea's move to drop the price of some drinks to single digits drew in a flood of orders. Yet for back-of-house staff, this was a nightmare—the newly switched imported green grape "Sweet Globe" variety has firm flesh and is extremely hard to peel. Employees peeled until their gloved fingers wore through, their right hands covered in medicated patches, and some even felt nauseated at the sight of fruit with skin on. Although some tried using peelers or small round spoons to improve efficiency, the output speed still could not keep up with store demand. Why not equip stores with peeling machines? Employees admitted frankly that the high loss rate and difficulty of cleaning make them worse than peeling by hand. This article takes you into the real daily life of Heytea's peelers, along with Front Street Coffee's attention to industry trends. [more…]

As coffee consumption continues to heat up, chain brands are stepping up inspections of store food safety and operations. Recently, an in-service Mstand barista spoke out on social media, complaining that after video audits were introduced, rules proliferated sharply—even drinking cups and takeaway bags became off-limits for employees, and any violation meant a red-line disciplinary action and forfeiture of performance pay. In the comments section, many peers chimed in with their own grievances, pointing to tight scheduling, high KPIs, and pressure from all sides, with some even speculating that this strict management approach was brought over by poached staff from Luckin. At the same time, Luckin itself is known for scheduled handwashing and rigorous cleaning, and its reputation for quality control has long been widely recognized. Strict oversight is in itself a necessary means of safeguarding consumer food safety, but how to strike the right balance and take frontline employees' legitimate rights and interests into account has become a topic worth deep reflection for brands, and Front Street Coffee will continue to follow such industry developments. [more…]

Coffee shops are supposed to be spaces for savoring and relaxation, yet a recent voyeuristic photo scandal exposed on a Douban group has shattered that tranquility. A coffee shop employee shared secretly taken photos of female customers' thighs in a WeChat group, proudly exchanging comments, which triggered strong condemnation from the coffee enthusiast community. The incident involved multiple coffee shops in Guilin, and the shops concerned issued statements one after another, apologizing for the misconduct of individual employees and dismissing or firing those involved. This incident not only violated customers' portrait rights and privacy but also cast a shadow over the professional image of the coffee industry. As coffee enthusiasts, we should pay more attention to baristas' professionalism and work ethics, and return to our love for and dedication to coffee itself. [more…]

In today's world, where specialty coffee culture is increasingly widespread, latte art has become almost a standard feature of hot lattes. However, when a latte without latte art was served to a customer, the ensuing complaint actually led to a barista losing their job—an incident at a Manner store that quickly went viral on social media. Some spoke up for the barista, arguing that latte art is merely decorative and inconsequential; others pointed out that since the brand has clear regulations, an employee who responds perfunctorily to customer feedback is indeed hard to exonerate. Behind this lies not only the relationship between latte art and coffee quality, but also the deeper conflicts faced by chain coffee brands amid rapid expansion—between staffing shortages, service standards, and consumer rights. [more…]

The 10th of each month is payday at Manner Coffee, and this year that day happened to coincide with the payout date for the 2024 year-end bonus. What should have been a day of double celebration instead turned into an anxious wait that kept many baristas awake all night. Some had their bank accounts credited on time, while others received only their January salary, with no sign of the year-end bonus. Even more puzzling was that some newcomers who had just joined two days earlier received bonuses, while store manager-level veteran employees who had worked diligently for years came away empty-handed. Within the company, accounts differed: HR explained it away as warning notices or policy adjustments, but employees pushed back. What exactly triggered this year-end bonus payout controversy? And why are the standards so unclear? [more…]