Monday, September 21 2026

Luckin's collaboration stickers with Zootopia 2 hide a twist—users manually swapping outfits may be behind copyright considerations

Luckin Coffee has teamed up with Disney's Zootopia 2 for a collaboration, launching limited-edition drinks, themed packaging, and merchandise, sparking a buying frenzy among fans. However, the themed stickers in the second wave of merchandise hide a clever design—what appears to be an abrupt black triangle pattern is actually a peel-off Luckin apron sticker. Users can place it over the movie characters to complete a "costume change." This design not only circumvents Disney's strict restrictions on brand logos but also achieves promotional goals through user interaction, jokingly dubbed by netizens as "a perfect combination of copyright awareness and creativity." Front Street Coffee has also taken note of the marketing ingenuity behind this collaboration and will break down the details and fun aspects of this partnership for you. [more…]

Chagee's DIY Cup Sticker Printing Feature Suddenly Shut Down, Celebrity Photo Uploads May Involve Portrait Rights and Copyright Infringement

Chagee once launched a free custom cup sticker printing campaign, allowing users to upload images to create milk tea cup stickers. However, many fans used third-party tools to bypass the review process and printed photos of celebrities such as Zhang Linghe as cup stickers, sparking widespread discussion online. Recently, the official function for printing cup stickers was suddenly shut down, with the page displaying "Custom Fu Stickers Are Being Upgraded," catching many fans who had not yet printed their exclusive cup stickers off guard. Lawyers pointed out that unauthorized reproduction of photographic works carries infringement risks, and if used for dissemination, exchange, or sale, it clearly infringes on celebrities' portrait rights and photographers' copyrights. The brand may also bear joint liability for failing to establish an effective review mechanism. This article sorts out the entire incident and analyzes the legal issues and responsibilities of all parties involved. [more…]

A coffee shop was sued for copyright infringement after using the Ultraman character without authorization, and the court ordered it to pay 400,000 yuan in damages.

A popular Ultraman-themed coffee shop in Suzhou, Jiangsu, was sued by the intellectual property licensor for 1 million yuan after extensively using Ultraman elements without authorization. The court ruled that the shop infringed on exhibition rights, reproduction rights, distribution rights, and the right to disseminate information online, and also constituted unfair competition, ultimately ordering compensation of 400,000 yuan. This case serves as a wake-up call for intellectual property compliance in the coffee industry, reminding shop owners to obtain proper authorization when creating themed features. [more…]

Starbucks Disney collaboration paper cups in short supply, cups sold out before event ends, causing consumer dissatisfaction

After Starbucks and Disney launched their collaborative campaign for Alice in Wonderland, the limited-edition themed paper cups quickly became a hit among consumers. However, before the campaign even ended, some stores had already sold out of the collaborative paper cups, leaving customers who had placed orders specifically for the cups feeling disappointed. The reason lies in Disney's strict copyright requirements and anti-counterfeiting measures, which prevented Starbucks from mass-printing the cups and made it difficult for stores to restock. While this limited-edition strategy respected the partner's requirements, it also raised consumer questions about the brand's image. Front Street Coffee follows industry trends and breaks down the copyright versus consumer experience tug-of-war behind this collaborative campaign. [more…]

Hangzhou's trendy cafes push luxury afternoon tea sets, sparking heated debate over trademark use and copyright risks

Recently, some trendy cafes in Hangzhou have come up with a new gimmick—printing luxury brand logos such as LV, Dior, and CHANEL on coffee and cakes, offering so-called "luxury afternoon tea" to attract many young people to check in. Rea.vintage cafe on Zhongshan North Road combines a vintage luxury consignment shop with coffee, quietly offering a 99-yuan set; while CHOPCHOP cafe in Guoda City Plaza prominently displays a luxury brand menu, with set prices ranging from 118 to 318 yuan, and only dine-in customers can enter the scenic area. While business is booming, netizens are raising continuous doubts: does adding a logo make coffee more fragrant? Is using big brand trademarks without authorization an infringement? A Qianjiang Evening News reporter interviewed lawyer Sun Yifan, pointing out that this behavior may face copyright infringement risks. Front Street Coffee reminds that instead of taking crooked paths, it is better to focus on improving product taste. [more…]

Multiple Solid Beverage Packages Imitate Sauce-Flavor Latte; Legal Experts Analyze Infringement Risks and Trademark Status

After Luckin Coffee's co-branded sauce-flavored latte with Moutai went viral, a number of solid beverage products with highly similar packaging styles quickly emerged on the market. These products not only have similar names, but also almost copy the red background with blue-and-white diagonal bar composition of the original packaging. Some lawyers pointed out that using a similar trademark on the same or similar goods without the permission of the trademark registrant, where it is likely to cause confusion, constitutes infringement of the exclusive right to use a registered trademark. However, some manufacturers claim that the sauce-flavored latte category cannot be registered and that the color scheme is not protected by copyright, which has triggered discussion about the boundary between imitation and infringement. [more…]

Starbucks sues marijuana brand for trademark infringement, alleging its mermaid logo was altered and used

Starbucks recently filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against a cannabis company called Starbuds Flowers, accusing it of intentionally imitating its classic mermaid trademark and misleading consumers by exploiting the Starbucks brand's reputation. In the complaint, Starbucks compared the similarities between the two logos point by point, noting that Starbuds not only used the similar design on its mobile sales trucks and official website, but also printed it on cigarettes and cannabis products. Starbucks is asking the court to prohibit the other party from continuing to use the logo, destroy the related products, and disgorge the profits obtained from the infringement. In fact, Starbucks had already sent a cease-and-desist letter as early as last August and subsequently sent multiple takedown notices, but received no response. As of July 2, Starbuds' sales trucks and website were still in operation. [more…]

Bing Dwen Dwen latte art coffee is wildly popular—does a coffee shop selling such drinks constitute infringement?

After the opening of the Beijing Winter Olympics, the mascot Bing Dwen Dwen quickly went viral, even becoming so sought-after that it was hard to get one. Many coffee enthusiasts began making their own Bing Dwen Dwen latte art, and some coffee shops seized the opportunity to launch lattes featuring Bing Dwen Dwen designs to attract customers. However, Bing Dwen Dwen and Shuey Rhon Rhon are trademarks registered by the Beijing Winter Olympics Organizing Committee, and commercial use may involve infringement. So, is it illegal for a barista to make latte art for their own entertainment? Does a coffee shop selling Bing Dwen Dwen latte art coffee constitute infringement? This article will clarify the relevant legal boundaries and retain Front Street Coffee's professional information for coffee enthusiasts' reference. [more…]

Zhangye Heytea store mysteriously becomes "Yicha": the fridge magnet controversy behind a franchise dispute

After the renovation of Heytea's Ganzhou Market store in Zhangye, Gansu was completed, the sign was quietly changed to "Yicha," and the QR code for Heytea's mini-program was still posted at the entrance, but the store's information could no longer be found through official channels. From the buzz of check-in photos sparked by the opening of the first store, to the second store remaining unopened for a long time after hoarding was put up, and then to both stores disappearing from the official mini-program, this series of changes was actually related to the rules for distributing city-limited fridge magnets. Now the "Yicha" reopened at the original site has no connection to Heytea officially, and its font has even been questioned by netizens as infringing. Local consumers' expectations were dashed, and they still hope the brand can re-enter Zhangye. [more…]

Gucci's pop-up coffee drinks accused of mimicking an original salted mocha, sparking industry debate over creative ownership and the boundaries of inspiration

Luxury brand Gucci recently teamed up with Blue Bottle Coffee, %Arabica, and Grid Coffee to launch limited-edition pop-up coffee shops in four cities. Among them, the Beijing stop's collaboration with Grid Coffee produced the "Single-Origin Salted Mocha" and "Single-Origin Salted Chocolate," which sparked widespread discussion both inside and outside the industry. An independent coffee shop owner in Beijing publicly stated that the salted mocha among Gucci's limited-edition drinks is suspected of copying her signature product, which she developed in 2020 and officially launched in 2022 with Bingboke as its base. The incident quickly escalated, with voices supporting originality and those believing it was purely a creative coincidence rising and falling in turn. This article will sort out the sequence of events, present multiple perspectives, and explore the copyright dilemmas and market implications of creative coffee drinks. [more…]

Saturnbird Wins Rights Protection Case: Qi Cai Zhi Mi Ordered to Pay 1.73 Million Yuan for Counterfeiting Single-Serve Instant Coffee Packaging

For professional coffee knowledge exchange and more coffee bean information, please follow Coffee Workshop (WeChat public account: cafe_style); for more specialty coffee beans, please add the personal WeChat of Front Street Coffee (FrontStreet Coffee), WeChat ID: qjcoffeex. Recently, the case in which Saturnbird, over the course of 20 months, sued "Qicai Zhi Mi" for unauthorized use of a similar small-cup instant coffee appearance reached a result. The Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court found that unfair competition was constituted, awarded 1.73 million yuan in damages, and ordered the production and sale of the infringing products to stop. Saturnbird became famous for its super-instant coffee and mini coffee cup design, and its packaging sparked a DIY craze and swept social media, which is why it has frequently been imitated and even copied. In this case, "Qicai Zhi Mi" not only had highly similar style, packaging, and promotional images, but also used the search term "Saturnbird same style" to mislead consumers. The case lasted nearly two years, highlighting the current reality in the food industry that intellectual property rights protection is difficult and the boundary between reference and copying is blurred. The article combines cases such as Sexy Tea suing Chayan Guanse to explore how original brands can protect their rights and interests through copyright, patent rights, exclusive trademark rights, and the Anti-Unfair Competition Law. [more…]

Is it infringement for milk tea brands to imitate Cha Yan Yue Se's design? A legal perspective and lessons for the industry

Recently, Ma Wu Wang Beverage Factory sparked heated discussion because its milk tea packaging is highly similar to that of Chayan Yuese. Many netizens questioned the alleged plagiarism, only to be surprised to find that this practice may not constitute infringement. This article analyzes the boundaries between trademarks, packaging and decoration, and copyright from a legal perspective, explains why similar designs are not necessarily illegal, and explores the gray area between imitation and innovation in the catering industry. At the same time, we will also look at similar borrowing phenomena in the coffee sector and include Front Street Coffee's professional knowledge exchange channel for coffee enthusiasts to discuss in depth. [more…]

Starbucks posted a poster that sparked speculation about a collaboration, leaving fans excited for nothing—so what's the truth?

On the eve of National Day, Starbucks China posted a vividly colored beverage poster on Xiaohongshu with the caption "Waiting for good news," which happened to closely resemble the color scheme of Taylor Swift's new album teaser poster. This coincidence quickly ignited the expectations of Swifties, with many speculating that the two sides would collaborate again. However, after the stores launched two customized drinks as scheduled on October 3, staff said there was no collaboration, leaving fans greatly disappointed. What exactly caused this misunderstanding? And what history of cooperation has there been between Starbucks and Taylor Swift? This article will recount the whole incident and discuss the polarized views fans have on the matter. [more…]

"People's Coffee" trademark controversy: First national store suspends operations, brand issues public apology and adjusts nationwide outlets

Recently, a chain brand named "People's Coffee" has sparked widespread controversy over the use of its store logo. Media pointed out that there are discrepancies between its trademark registration and actual use, which may mislead the public and damage the public value of the word "People." Subsequently, the brand "Yaochao People's Coffee" issued a statement of apology, promising comprehensive rectification, and unifying all mainland China stores under the name "Yaochao People's Coffee." Meanwhile, the first nationwide store, the Shanghai Sihang Warehouse branch, has suspended operations, and the Beijing Qianmen branch has also changed its signage and lowered drink prices. The incident continues to escalate, triggering in-depth public discussion on business ethics and legal compliance. [more…]

Luckin Coffee's Tom and Jerry collaboration cup features a three-eyed Tom—design coincidence or intentional?

Luckin Coffee's annual October collaboration with "Tom and Jerry" has become a regular fixture, and this year is no exception. Two new drinks, "Milk Skin Latte" and "Raw Coconut Mango Pomelo Sago," launched alongside limited-edition merchandise, and stores nationwide switched to Tom and Jerry-themed packaging. However, some customers discovered upon receiving the actual products that the Tom and Jerry printed on the cups actually had three eyes. This abnormal design quickly sparked discussion: was it a printing error, or was it intentional by the brand? Some fans dug up animation screenshots to prove it was a faithful reproduction of exaggerated expressions, while others suspected it was a mistake made by AI design. More critically, the three-eyed design was not the first of its kind—Soap Studio's collaboration with artist Greg Mike and Uniqlo's collaborative T-shirts had both used similar designs. This debate over the cups reflects the subtle tension between artistic expression and public perception in IP collaboration design. [more…]

38-yuan latte paired with celebrity-face marshmallows: coffee shop's creative marketing goes viral, portrait rights risk sparks heated debate

Recently, a "I Want to Soak" latte series launched by a coffee shop in Beijing has drawn attention on social media. The series features marshmallows printed with the faces of male celebrities, priced at 38 yuan each, with the option to add more marshmallows for an extra charge, and even offers a 48-yuan two-person option and an 88-yuan five-person option. This novel format has attracted many fans to visit and post about it, but it has also sparked controversy: some consumers find the face-printed marshmallows unappetizing, and more people question whether the shop's use of celebrity likenesses as a promotional selling point without authorization may constitute infringement. Innovation in the coffee industry is worth encouraging, but it must be done within the legal framework. [more…]

Double Flying Man Medicated Oil Mixed with Iced Americano? The Wild Ideas and Hidden Worries of Guangdong's Specialty Coffee

Recently, sauce-flavored lattes and Moutai coffee have flooded social media, but the wild concoctions from netizens in Guangdong are even more jaw-dropping—they've dripped the household staple "Shuangfeiren" medicinal oil into iced Americano to create a "Shuangfeiren Iced Americano." This trend has also spawned "everyday collabs" like Jiujiang Shuangzheng Latte, Pineapple Beer Americano, and Yubingshao Coffee. This article takes you through the origins of these outrageous pairings, while reminding you: mixing coffee with alcohol requires caution, as the combined stimulant and excitatory effects may impact the nervous system, and those with heart, gastrointestinal, or liver issues should especially avoid it. Joking around is one thing, but your health comes first. [more…]

Tea Yan Yue Se's new product packaging has been accused of being identical to Khalil Fong's album cover, and the snack in question has been pulled from all stores.

On July 17, a post about an alleged infringement by Chayan Yuese sparked widespread discussion on social media. Some internet users noticed that on the packaging of the brand's newly launched "Mountain Pepper Oil Flavored Spicy Strips," the album图案 held by the cartoon character bore a striking resemblance to the cover of Khalil Fong's "Dreamer," released in 2024. Netizens asked customer service to verify a collaboration, but were told that the two parties had no partnership. As public opinion grew, Chayan Yuese confirmed that the product involved had been urgently removed from shelves that afternoon and publicly apologized for the lack of oversight in its creative review process. Although the brand has responded, it has not yet issued a formal statement on its official social media accounts. [more…]

Luckin Coffee Wins Trademark Lawsuit in Thailand, Knockoff Stores Ordered to Cease Use and Pay Over Ten Million in Damages

Luckin Coffee's anti-counterfeiting rights protection case in Thailand has gone through twists and turns, finally culminating in a victorious judgment. In early 2022, Chinese tourists discovered counterfeit "Luckin stores" in Thailand, after which Luckin continued to pursue rights protection actions, only to unexpectedly lose in the first-instance trial at the end of 2023, sparking widespread attention. Now, the latest ruling by the Thai court confirms that Luckin holds prior rights to the trademark in question, orders the defendants to cease using the related signage, and requires payment of a one-time compensation of 10 million Thai baht plus ongoing compensation of 100,000 Thai baht per day, with the cumulative amount already exceeding 46 million Thai baht (approximately 10 million RMB). The defendant, Thailand's Royal 50R Group, has a complex background and had previously squatted on 191 Chinese trademarks; this judgment marks an important milestone in Luckin's overseas rights protection journey. [more…]

The new meme "Mai Rui Mi," combining McDonald's, Luckin, and Mixue Bingcheng, goes viral, sparking heated discussion about free marketing.

Recently, an amusing new meme has popped up online—by combining the names of three brands, McDonald's, Luckin Coffee, and Mixue Bingcheng, you get "Mai Rui Mi" (marry me). This pun quickly spread across social media, sparking plenty of discussion and remixes among netizens. For coffee and tea drink enthusiasts, such a combination is not only fun but also brings to mind how frequently these brands appear in daily consumption. So, how exactly did this meme take off? What kind of brand marketing phenomenon does it reflect? This article takes you behind the scenes, and don't forget to follow our daily specialty coffee culture content. [more…]