A Japanese-style café located in Jinjiang District, Chengdu, caused an uproar online after the owner wrote phrases such as "Not photo-friendly | Not office-friendly | Not friendly to lower-class people" in their social media bio. What were originally just in-store rules prohibiting standing photos and photos after changing seats were interpreted by netizens as a public belittlement of customers due to the insulting wording "lower-class people." After the incident escalated, the café's recommended menu on review platforms was collectively edited, with joking names such as "Lower-Class Coffee" and "Lower-Class Latte" topping the list. Although the owner once posted an explanation of what "lower-class people" referred to, both the bio and the post have been deleted. This conflict also sparked widespread discussion about the boundaries of merchant rules and customer dignity. [more…]

Before deciding which café to visit, many people are in the habit of first checking ratings online, scrolling through reviews, or watching a few探店 videos to do their homework. But when "glowing reviews aren't necessarily real, and bad reviews aren't necessarily fake" becomes the norm,探店 reviews themselves turn into a business. This article sorts through the chat records of review-bombing exposed on Xiaohongshu, several cases in recent years of探店 bloggers "flopping," as well as the payment chains and regulatory gaps in the探店 industry, and invites legal experts to offer advice on defending one's rights in cases of malicious bad reviews, dine-and-dash "霸王餐" behavior, and similar phenomena. For café owners and consumers, seeing clearly how this traffic game operates may be more important than arguing over whether a single review is real. [more…]