Sunday, November 1 2026

Facts About Fair Trade Coffee: What the Gulangyu Restroom Dispute Reveals

May 8, 2023
qj

What does the coffee shop restroom debate reveal about cafes?

A coffee shop in Gulangyu, Xiamen, refused to let a non-paying father use its restroom for his child, and the exchange went viral online. Staff said only paying customers could use the single restroom; the father accused the shop of caring only about money. Commenters split over whether the refusal was reasonable.

The shop already posts a no-browsing sign because of heavy tourist traffic, and the manager noted other paying customers also need the one restroom. The case raises a practical question about cafes as commercial spaces: what obligations, if any, do they carry toward the surrounding community when a restroom is a scarce resource?

Recently, a coffee shop in Gulangyu, Xiamen, sparked heated online discussion after refusing to let non-paying customers use its restroom for free. In the video, a father got into an argument with an employee because his child urgently needed the toilet, questioning whether the shop "only cares about money," to which the shop staff bluntly replied, "Yes, only money." Behind the incident lies the complex relationship between the boundaries of commercial spaces and public moral expectations. Some argue that one should make a purchase first or find a public restroom, some criticize the merchant for lacking tolerance, and others support the merchant's refusal to be morally coerced. As coffee lovers, we might use this incident as a starting point to reflect on the balance between cafes as commercial spaces and their role in the community.

▲

Click to follow | Daily specialty coffee culture magazine Coffee Workshop

Recently, a short video filmed in Gulangyu spread rapidly on social media: a coffee shop refused a non-paying customer's request to use the restroom for free.

In the footage, a man is engaged in a heated argument with a coffee shop employee. The man repeatedly demands, "How does it affect you? You only care about money, right?" while the employee responds without hesitation, "Yes, only money."

It is understood that this video came from a submission by a netizen with knowledge of the situation. According to the netizen, this coffee shop is located in Gulangyu, Xiamen. Because tourists flock there constantly, the shop has specially placed a "No Browsing" sign at its entrance, meaning that those who do not make a purchase cannot enter the shop to look around.

At the time of the incident, the father walked into the shop because his child suddenly needed to use the toilet and asked the staff if they could borrow the restroom. But the staff clearly stated that only paying customers could use it. The father immediately retorted, "What does it affect you if a child uses the toilet? Do you only care about money? I can even book the whole place, call your manager (boss) here."

Soon after, the person in charge of the coffee shop arrived and also refused the father's request, explaining that the shop had only one restroom, which other customers also needed to use, so it was not convenient to offer it to outsiders. "Giving it only to you and not to others, that wouldn't be fair."

Faced with the shop's firm stance, the boy's father continued to press: "How does it affect you? I have no problem spending money here, but you only care about money, right?" Under the repeated interrogation of "do you only care about money or not," the coffee shop responded: "Only money, yes."

With no resolution from the communication, the father had no choice but to leave with his child. This scene happened to be filmed by a nearby customer, which led to the video at the beginning.

After the incident gained traction, netizens' opinions clearly split.

Some netizens believed that since the child urgently needed the toilet, the father could simply buy something in the shop or directly find a nearby public restroom, and there was no need to argue for so long. "Just buy a cup of coffee," "Just make a purchase."

Some netizens also felt that the merchant's attitude was too harsh. It was just a child using the toilet, so there was no need to make such a big deal of it. Adults can hold it, but young children easily cannot control themselves, which is why they look for the nearest restroom. Doing business should involve some tolerance, and it is fine to offer convenience to the elderly and children.

Of course, quite a few netizens agreed more with the merchant's approach. The restroom is private property to begin with, and the merchant has the right to decide whether to open it to others. "Refusing moral coercion, the shop did great," "This is a coffee shop, not a public toilet," "Letting you use it is a favor; not letting you use it is their right."

With that, how do you all view this?

Disclaimer: Some images in this article are from the internet. For some content on the website, such as images, we will respect the original author's copyright and indicate the source. However, due to the large volume, some images and text may not have been credited in time. Please forgive us. If the original author has any dispute, they may contact the website for handling, and once verified, we will correct it immediately. Compiled and edited by "Coffee Workshop." Please indicate the source when reposting. If there is infringement, please inform us for deletion. Thank you~!

Gulangyu coffee shop refusing free public restroom use sparks discussion: the dispute between commercial boundaries and moral obligation

The above content is compiled by CoffeeHunters, a coffee news website.

You May Also Like